Research on Gas Emission Combination Forecast Method Based on Improved AHP

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three original forecast methods such as exponential prediction, hyperbola prediction and grey prediction were combined to propose a new method to improve the forecast accuracy of gas emission in coalmines considering three factors of those methods, which are stability, data utilization and appropriate time interval. The combination weights were determined by Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). By using the combination forecast method to predict the gas emission of a coalmine in northwest of China as an example, the results appeared that this new method had a better accuracy and easy operation, comparing with the results of three original forecast methods. The method had a positive direct significance to gas emission prediction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

876-880

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bai Qing-sheng, Jing Yan-ning. Forecast of Gas Emission Based on Grey-Neural Network Combined Model[J]. Coal Technology, 2009, 28(8), pp.70-71.

Google Scholar

[2] Gao Min. Forecast of Coal and Gas Outburst Level of Dangerous[J]. Coal, 2009, 18(7), pp.12-14.

Google Scholar

[3] Wang Wen-bo, Hui Xiao-jian. Study on Prediction of Gas Gushing Amount Based on Improved GM(1, 1) Model[J]. Coal Technology, 2010, 29(6), pp.123-125.

Google Scholar

[4] Yang Gui-yuan. How to Choose and Apply Appropriate Economic Projection Methods[J]. Beijing Statistics, 2000, (9), pp.29-33.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Li-qing, Qin Yu-jin. The Status and Prospect of Coal Mine Gas Emission Forecasting Method of China[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2007, 38(8), pp.58-60.

Google Scholar

[6] Xie Wan-xing, Sun Hui-min. The Grey Forecasting Method of Coal Mine Gas Emission[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2002, 33(4), p.4.

Google Scholar

[7] Huang Wei-yong, Tong min-ming. Nonlinear Combination Forecast of Gas Emission Amount Based on SVM[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2009, 38(2), pp.234-239.

Google Scholar

[8] Jing Guo-xun, Shi Shi-liang. System security assessment and prediction[M]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining & Technology Press, (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] Jiang Qi-yuan, Xie Jin-xing. Mathematical Model[M]. Beijing : The higher education press, (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] Liu-ping. Study on Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Improvement. Science & Technology Association Forum, 2008, (4), p.35.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhang Tian-jun, Su-lin. Prediction of coal and gas outburst level based on improved AHP[J]. Journal of Xi an University of Science and Technology, 2010, 30(5), pp.536-542.

Google Scholar

[12] Liu Yu-lin, You Chun. Application of the improved analytic hierarchy process to risk assessment on road tunnel construction[J]. Mining Safety and Environmental Protection, 2004, 16(3), pp.76-78.

Google Scholar

[13] Li Chang-cheng, Li Jia-xiang. Mine Well Gas Grade Partition by Absolute Gas Emission Amount[J]. Coal, 1998, 7(2), pp.43-44.

Google Scholar