RETRACTED: Towards the Study of Internet Qos that would Make Exploring Smalltalk a Real Possibility

Retracted:

This paper has been retracted by publisher.
This paper was found to be in violation of the scope and quality criteria. The document is now considered retracted. Due to strong violation, necessary effort should be made to remove all further references to this paper.
We regret any inconvenience this publication might cause you.

Article Preview

Abstract:

Retracted paper: Unified highly-available information has led to many compelling advances, including evolutionary programming and virtual machines. Given the current status of replicated information, hackers worldwide particularly desire the refinement of voice-over-IP, which embodies the significant principles of networking. Hackers worldwide agree that self-learning symmetries are an interesting new topic in the field of robotics, and electrical engineers concur. In fact, few leading analysts would disagree with the construction of multi-processors, which embodies the natural principles of cryptography. Our focus in this position paper is not on whether RAID can be made compact, optimal, and real-time, but rather on proposing new heterogeneous configurations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

683-688

Online since:

April 2014

Authors:

Keywords:

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems, http://varma.ece.cmu.edu/cps/, Oct. (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] E. A. Lee, Computing Foundations and Practice for Cyber-Physical Systems: A Preliminary Report, University of California at Berkeley, Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2007-72, May (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] X. Chen, S. Wong, and C. Tse, Adding randomness to modeling internet tcp-red systems with interactive gateways,, IEEE Tran. on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 57, p.300–304, July (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2010.2043388

Google Scholar

[4] F. Xia, QoS Challenges and Opportunities in Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks,, Sensors, 8(2): 1099-1110, (2008).

DOI: 10.3390/s8021099

Google Scholar

[5] F. Akyildiz, I. H. Kasimoglu, Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges,, Ad Hoc Netw., 2 (4): 351-367, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.04.003

Google Scholar

[6] G. Bumiller, L. Lu, and Y. Song, Analytic performance comparison of routing protocols in master-slave PLC networks,, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Power Line Commun. Applications, Apr. 2005, p.116–120.

DOI: 10.1109/isplc.2005.1430477

Google Scholar

[7] M. Biagi and L. Lampe, Location assisted routing techniques for powerline communication in smart grids,, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Grid Commun., Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Oct. 2010, p.274–278.

DOI: 10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622056

Google Scholar

[8] L. Lampe and A. Vinck, Cooperative multihop power line communications,, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Power Line Commun. Applications, Mar. 2012, p.1–6.

DOI: 10.1109/isplc.2012.6201337

Google Scholar

[9] H. Gharavi and B. Hu, Multigate communication network for smart grid,, Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 6, p.1028–1045, Jun. (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2011.2123851

Google Scholar

[10] D. Dietrich, D. Bruckner, G. Zucker, and P. Palensky, Communication and computation in buildings: A short introduction and overview,, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 11, p.3577–3584, Nov. (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tie.2010.2046570

Google Scholar

[11] C. Zimmer and F. Mueller, Fault-tolerant network routing through software overlays for intelligent power grids,, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Parallel Distrib. Syst., Dec. 2010, p.542–549.

DOI: 10.1109/icpads.2010.47

Google Scholar

[12] K. Gill, S. Yang, F. Yao, and X. Lu, A ZigBee-based home automation system,, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 55, no. 2, p.422–430, May (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/tce.2009.5174403

Google Scholar

[13] P. Samadi, A. Mohsenian-Rad, R. Schober, V. W. S. Wong, and J. Jatske- vich, ``Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid,, in Proc. 1st IEEE Conf. Smart Grid Commun., Oct. 2010, pp.415-420.

DOI: 10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622077

Google Scholar

[14] A. H. Mohsenian-Rad and A. Leon-Garcia, ``Optimal residential loadcontrol with price prediction in real-time electricity pricing environments,,IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp.120-133, Sep. (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2010.2055903

Google Scholar

[15] M. Parvania and M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, ``Demand response scheduling bystochastic SCUC,, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.89-98,Jun. (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2010.2046430

Google Scholar

[16] S. Caron and G. Kesidis, ``Incentive-based energy consumption scheduling algorithms for the smart grid,, in Proc. 1st IEEE Conf. Smart Grid Commun., Oct. 2010, pp.391-396.

DOI: 10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622073

Google Scholar

[17] A. H. Mohsenian-Rad,et. al, ``Optimal and autonomous incentive-based energy consumption scheduling algorithm for smart grid,, in Proc. ISGT, Jan. 2010, pp.1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/isgt.2010.5434752

Google Scholar

[18] A. J. Conejo, J. M. Morales, and L. Baringo, ``Real-time demand response model,, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 3, p.236242, Dec. (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2010.2078843

Google Scholar

[19] A. Hatami, H. Sei, ``A stochastic-based decision-making framework for an electricity retailer: Time-of-use pricing and electricity protfolio optimization,, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp.1808-1816, Nov. (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2095431

Google Scholar

[20] A. Eydeland and K. Wolyniec, Energy and Power Risk Management. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, (2003).

Google Scholar

[21] C. Triki and A. Violi, ``Dynamic pricing of electricity in retailer markets,, 4OR, A Quart. J. Oper. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp.21-36, Mar. (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s10288-007-0056-2

Google Scholar