Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying the Imbalanced Protocol Flows

Article Preview

Abstract:

The collision that between a car and a train is the main type of accidents in the case railway level-crossing, which is proved by the arrangement diagram analysing. The fault tree analysis and the event tree analysis are used to assess the level of the risk of the level-crossing quantificationally. Some conclusions can be drawn: the collision of the railway level-crossing that between a car and a train will happen 2.552 in a year, which can bring 0.061 equivalent fatalities. This paper puts forward some precautionary measures that based on the minimal cut set of the collision of the accident and the most probable or the highest risk event.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

809-814

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wang Tao, Yu Shun-zheng. Advances in machine learing based network traffic calssification[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2012, 33(5): 1033-1040.

Google Scholar

[2] Moore A, Zuev D. Internet traffic classification using Bayesian analysis techniques[C]. In ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems ( SIGMETRICS) 2005,Banff, Alberta, Canada, June, 2005.

DOI: 10.1145/1064212.1064220

Google Scholar

[3] Auld T,Moore A W,Gull S F. Bayesian neural networks for Internet traffic classification[J]. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, January, 2007, 18(1): 223- 239.

DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2006.883010

Google Scholar

[4] Xu Peng, Liu Qiong, Lin Sen. Internet traffic classification using support vector machine[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2009, 46(3): 407-414.

Google Scholar

[5] Xu Peng, Lin Sen. Internet traffic classification using C4. 5 decision tree[J]. Journal of software, 2009, 20(10): 2692-2704.

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1001.2009.03444

Google Scholar

[6] Zhou Jjianfeng, Yang Aimin, Liu Jicai. Traffic classification approach based on improved C4. 5 algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Application, 2012, 48(5): 71-74.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Hong-li, Lu Gang. Machine learning algorithms for classifying the imbalanced protocol flows: evaluation and comparison[J]. Journal of software, 2012, 23(6): 1500 1516.

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1001.2012.04074

Google Scholar

[8] Chen Yun-jing. P2P traffic identification technology research[D]. JiangSu: Yangzhou University,(2009).

Google Scholar

[9] Erman J, Mahanti A, Arlit t M, et al. Offline/Online Traffic Classification Using Semi-supervised Learning[R]. Technical report. University of Calgary , (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] Liu Bin, Li Zhi-tang, Tu Hao. Network application calssification method based on semi-supervised learning[J]. Microelectronics and Computer, 2008, 25(10): 113-116.

Google Scholar

[11] Lin GZ, Xin Y, Niu XX, Jiang HB. Network traffic classification based on semi-supervised clustering[C]. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, December 2010, 17(Suppl. 2): 84-88.

DOI: 10.1016/s1005-8885(09)60577-x

Google Scholar

[12] Li X, Qi F, Xu D, et al. An internet traffic classification method based on semi-supervised support vector machine[C]/2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications(ICC).

DOI: 10.1109/icc.2011.5962736

Google Scholar

[13] Zhang Zhen, Wang Bin-qiang, Li Xiang-tao, Huang Wan-wei. Semi-supervised traffic identification based on affinity propagation[J]. Acta automatica sinica, 2013, 39(7): 1100-1109.

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1004.2013.01100

Google Scholar

[14] Zhang Yan, Lu Danju, Wu Baoguo. Research of Semi-supervised classification algorithm based on Tri-Training[J]. Computer technology and development, 2013, 23(7): 77-83.

Google Scholar

[15] Moore A W, Zuev D. Discriminators for use in flow-based classification [R]. Cambridge: Intel Research, (2005).

Google Scholar