Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol for Hydrogen Production: Modeling and Simulation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Autothermal reforming (ATR), which is the combination of endothermic steam reforming and exothermic partial oxidation, is an attractive process to produce hydrogen using for transportation fuel cell because of its moderate size. ATR is considered to be thermally self-sustaining that the external heat source is not required. In order to keep the adiabatic temperature of ATR reactor, the process control strategy needs in understanding the dynamic characteristics of the ATR system. Thus, the modeling and simulation of ATR process for hydrogen production fueled by ethanol is carried out in this work. The open loop responses of the feed and ATR temperatures are simulated by the dynamic models of ATR system. The simulation results showed the predominantly influence of the electrical power of preheater on the feed and ATR temperatures while the air flowrate has an inverse effect on the feed temperature and a direct effect on the ATR temperature. As a result, the match of control loop is very sensible for an effective control strategy in the development of control system design for maintaining the adiabatic temperature of ATR reactor for sustaining the effectiveness of hydrogen production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

108-112

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. -S. Seo, A. Shirley and S.T. Kolaczkowski: J. Power Sources Vol. 108 (2002), pp.213-225.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Ipsakis, S. Voutetakis, P. Seferlis, S. Papadopoulou and M. Stoukides: Proc. 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Thessaloniki, Greece (2009), pp.1421-1426.

DOI: 10.1109/med.2009.5164746

Google Scholar

[3] T. Takeguchi, S. -N. Furukawa, M. Inoue and K. Eguchi: Appl. Catal. A, Vol. 240 (2003), pp.223-233.

Google Scholar

[4] B.F. Hagh: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 28 (2003), pp.1369-1377.

Google Scholar

[5] T.J. Schildhauer and K. Geissler: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 32 (2007), pp.1806-1810.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Zahedi nezhad, S. Rowshanzamir and M.H. Eikani: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 34 (2009), pp.1292-1300.

Google Scholar

[7] S.H. Chan and H.M. Wang: J. Power Sources Vol. 126 (2004), pp.8-15.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Tsourapas, J. Sun and A. Nickens: Energy Vol. 33 (2008), pp.300-310.

Google Scholar

[9] T.A. Semelsberger, L.F. Brown, R.L. Borup and M.A. Inbody: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 29 (2004), pp.1047-1064.

Google Scholar

[10] M.H. Halabi, M.H.J.M. de Croon, J. van der Schaaf, P.D. Cobden and J.C. Schouten: Chem. Eng. J. Vol 137 (2008), pp.568-578.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Chen and J. Sun: Proc. 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, LA, USA (2007), pp.4608-4613.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Hu, D.J. Chmielewski and D. Papadias: J. Power Sources Vol. 182 (2008), pp.298-306.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Wutthithanyawat and N. Srisiriwat: Applied Mechanics and Materials. Vol. 415 (2013), pp.651-657.

Google Scholar

[14] N. Srisiriwat and C. Wutthithanyawat: Applied Mechanics and Materials. Vol. 415 (2013), pp.658-665.

Google Scholar