Optimal Sequence-Dependent Job Scheduling of Packing Process with Multiple Non-Identical Machines in Tablet Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Government Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO) is one of the largest pharmaceutical manufacturers in Thailand. GPO provides many medicinal products such as tablets and capsules to increase drug access to the Thai population through public hospitals and retail stores. Orders from these customers are accumulated and signal drug production. However, backorder shipments occur frequently and are estimated to worth about 180 million baths (or 6 million USD) a year. Initial study shows that the packing process behaves as a bottleneck, causing delays in the production and consequently to the drug shipments. The packing process utilizes multiple machines with different speeds and capacities. Moreover, instead of setup time in other manufacturing processes, drug production including the packing process requires a clearance process after each job—which is critical in pharmaceutical industry to reduce the risk of cross-contamination between drugs. The clearance time depends on the drug type of the next job. This paper presents a problem of job scheduling using parallel non-identical machines with sequence dependent clearance times. The objective is to minimize the total makespan. The mathematical model of the problem is a mixed integer/binary program. A numerical example from actual packing jobs is used to illustrate its application and solved by Excel Solver software.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1046-1050

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Allahverdi, C.T. Ng, T.C.E. Cheng and M.Y. Kovalyov: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 187 (2008), p.985.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Vallada and R. Ruiz: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 211 (2011), p.612.

Google Scholar

[3] C.A. Méndez, G.P. Henning and J. Cardá: Computer and Chemical Engineering, Vol. 24 (2000) p.2233.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Venditti, D. Pacciarelli and C. Meloni: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 202 (2010), p.538.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Chitmetha, S. Prombanpong, and T. Somboonwiwat: International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, Vol. 4 (2013) p.241.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Stefansson, S. Sigmarsdottir, P. Jensson and N. Shah: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 215 (2011), p.383.

Google Scholar