A Neural-Q-Learning Based Approach for Delay Tolerant Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

Delay tolerance is a major design concern for supporting underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks (UA-WSNs) to carry out tasks in harsh subsea environments. Due to the great difference between the underwater acoustic channel and the radio frequency channel, most of the existing routing protocols developed for terrestrial wireless sensor networks perform poorly in underwater acoustic communications. In this work, we present a Neural-Q-Learning algorithm based delay tolerant protocol for UA-WSNs. Due to the advantages of the artificial neural network along with the Q-Learning algorithm, the ferry node is capable of determining an optimal route in a two-dimensional continuous space to relay packets effectively and efficiently between sensors. Simulation results show that the delivery delay and delivery cost of the network significantly decrease by maximizing the meeting probability between the ferry node and sensors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1530-1535

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Hu, Y. Fei, QELAR: A Machine-Learning-Based Adaptive Routing Protocol for Energy-Efficient and Lifetime-Extended Underwater Sensor Networks, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, June 2010, vol. 9, no. 6, pp.796-809.

DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2010.28

Google Scholar

[2] S. Climent, JV Capella, N. Meratnia, JJ Serrano, Underwater Sensor Networks: A New Energy Efficient and Robust Architecture. Sensors. 2012; 12(1): 704-731.

DOI: 10.3390/s120100704

Google Scholar

[3] T. Hu, Y. Fei, An Adaptive and Energy-efficient Routing Protocol Based on Machine Learning for Underwater Delay Tolerant Networks, Modeling, Analysis & Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on , vol., no., p.381, 384, 17-19 Aug. (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/mascots.2010.45

Google Scholar

[4] C. Gaskett, D. Wettergreen and A. Zelinsky, Q-Learning in Continuous State and Action Spaces, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 1747/1999, pp.417-428, (1999).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46695-9_35

Google Scholar

[5] Anderson, J. A., 1995, Introduction to Neural Networks (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Google Scholar

[6] Limei Zhou; Liwei Zhang, A Log-Sigmoid Lagrangian Neural Network for Solving Nonlinear Programming, Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2007. SNPD 2007. Eighth ACIS International Conference on , vol. 3, no., p.427, 431, July 30 2007-Aug. 1 (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/snpd.2007.15

Google Scholar

[7] D. Levin, The approximation power of moving Least-Squares, Mathematics of Computation, vol. 67, p.1517–1531, (1998).

DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-98-00974-0

Google Scholar

[8] J.G. Proakis, E.M. Sozer, J.A. Rice, M. Stojanovic, Shallow water acoustic networks, IEEE Communications Magazine 39 (11) (2001) 114–119.

DOI: 10.1109/35.965368

Google Scholar

[9] Rumelhart, David E.; Hinton, Geoffrey E., Williams, Ronald J. (8 October 1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors,. Nature 323 (6088): 533–536.

DOI: 10.1038/323533a0

Google Scholar

[10] J. G. Bellingham, Small, High Performance Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Report 01-04, (1997).

Google Scholar