Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Foam Stability Dependence on Nanoparticle Concentration for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Foam flooding is an established approach in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) to recover a significant quantity of the residual oil left in the reservoir after primary and secondary recovery. However, foam flooding faces various problems due to low viscosity effect, which reduces its efficiency in recovering oil. Using surfactant to stabilize CO2 foam may reduce mobility and improve areal and vertical sweep efficiency, but the potential weaknesses are such that high surfactant retention in porous media and unstable foam properties under high temperature reservoir conditions. Nanoparticles have higher adhesion energy to the fluid interface, which potentially stabilize longer lasting foams. Thus, this paper is aimed to investigate the CO2 foam stability and mobility characteristics at different concentration of nanosilica, brine and surfactant. Foam generator has been used to generate CO2 foam and analyze its stability under varying nanosilica concentration from 100 - 5000 ppm, while brine salinity and surfactant concentration ranging from 0 to 2.0 wt% NaCl and 0 – 10000 ppm, respectively. Foam stability was investigated through observation of the foam bubble size and the reduction of foam height inside the observation tube. The mobility was reduced as the concentration of nanosilica increased with the presence of surfactant. After 150 minutes of observation, the generated foam height reduced by 10%. Liquid with the presence of both silica nanoparticles and surfactant generated more stable foam with lower mobility. It can be concluded that the increase in concentration of nanosilica and addition of surfactant provided significant effects on the foam stability and mobility, which could enhance oil recovery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1876-1880

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. T. Turta & A. K. Singhal (2002). Field Foam Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects: Screening and Design Aspects. (10). doi: 10. 2118/02-10-14.

DOI: 10.2118/02-10-14

Google Scholar

[2] L. L. Schramm (1994). Foams: fundamentals and applications in the petroleum industry (Vol. 242): American Chemical Society.

Google Scholar

[3] J. G. Roof (1970). Snap-Off of Oil Droplets in Water-Wet Pores.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Yu, C. An, D. Mo, N. Liu & R. L. Lee (2012). Foam Mobility Control for Nanoparticle-Stabilized Supercritical CO2 Foam. Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/153336-ms

Google Scholar

[5] B. P. Binks & T. S. Horozov (2005). Aqueous foams stabilized solely by silica nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie, 117(24), 3788-3791.

DOI: 10.1002/ange.200462470

Google Scholar

[6] R. G. Alargova, D. S. Warhadpande, V. N. Paunov & O. D. Velev (2004). Foam superstabilization by polymer microrods. Langmuir, 20(24), 10371-10374.

DOI: 10.1021/la048647a

Google Scholar

[7] S. Fujii, P. D. Iddon, A. J. Ryan & S. P. Armes (2006). Aqueous particulate foams stabilized solely with polymer latex particles. Langmuir, 22(18), 7512-7520.

DOI: 10.1021/la060812u

Google Scholar

[8] S. Zhang, D. Sun, X. Dong, C. Li & J. Xu (2008). Aqueous foams stabilized with particles and nonionic surfactants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 324(1), 1-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.03.020

Google Scholar

[9] K. Xiangling & M. Ohadi (2010). Applications of Micro and Nano Technologies in the Oil and Gas Industry - Overview of the Recent Progress. Paper presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

DOI: 10.2118/203305-ms

Google Scholar

[10] A. Worthen, H. Bagaria, Y. Chen, S. Bryant, C. Huh & K. Johnston (2012). Nanoparticle Stabilized Carbon Dioxide in Water Foams for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium.

DOI: 10.2118/154285-ms

Google Scholar

[11] D. Mo, J. Yu, N. Liu & R. L. Lee (2012). Study of the Effect of Different Factors on Nanoparticle-Stablized CO2 Foam for Mobility Control. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/159282-ms

Google Scholar

[12] D. A. Espinoza, F. M. Caldelas, K. P. Johnston, S. L. Bryant & C. Huh (2010).

Google Scholar