Steam Methane Reforming of Natural Gas with Substantial Carbon Dioxide Contents – Process Optimization for Gas-to-Liquid Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Steam methane reforming has been a conventional process to produce synthesis gas which is an important feedstock to many chemicals. However, for gas to liquid (GTL) applications this reforming process is not suitable as it produces synthesis gas with very high hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio than required by the Fischer Tropsch synthesis in GTL line. In this work, a GTL process is designed in which synthesis gas is produced by steam reforming from a natural gas feedstock containing relatively substantial carbon dioxide contents in it. Synthesis gas composition is tailored by tail gas recycling from the Fischer Tropsch products. Process simulation and optimization is performed on Aspen HYSYS to produce synthesis gas with hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio of 2 which is desired in GTL technology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

316-320

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Petersen Kim, T.S. Christensen, C. S. Nielsen, I. Dybkjær, I., Fuel Processing Technology 2003, 83 (1), 253-261.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Steynberg, M. Dry, eds. Fischer-Tropsch Technology, Vol. 152, Access Online via Elsevier, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] P. Nader, V. Becher, CHRISGAS Report, WP11_D89, October (2005).

Google Scholar

[4] Rojey, A. (Ed. ). (1997). Natural gas: production, processing, transport. Editions OPHRYS.

Google Scholar

[5] L. Ke, C. Song, V. Subramani, eds. Hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] D.K. Arno, Fischer-Tropsch Refining, Wiley. Com, (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] Xu, J., & Froment, G. F. (1989). Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE Journal, 35(1), 88-96.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690350109

Google Scholar

[8] Iglesia, E., Reyes, S. C., & Soled, S. L. (1993). Reaction-transport selectivity models and the design of Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES-NEW YORK-MARCEL DEKKER-, 199-199.

DOI: 10.1201/9781003067115-7

Google Scholar

[9] Krishna, R., & Sie, S. T. (2000). Design and scale-up of the Fischer–Tropsch bubble column slurry reactor. Fuel Processing Technology, 64(1), 73-105.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00128-9

Google Scholar

[10] Fox III, J. M., & Tam, S. S. (1995). Correlation of slurry reactor Fischer-Tropsch yield data. Topics in Catalysis, 2(1-4), 285-300.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01491973

Google Scholar

[11] Panahi, M., Rafiee, A., Skogestad, S., & Hillestad, M. (2011). A natural gas to liquids process model for optimal operation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(1), 425-433.

DOI: 10.1021/ie2014058

Google Scholar