The Optimum Number of Trays and Solvent Circulation Rate in Removing Acid Gases in Absorption Unit

Abstract:

Removal of acid gases from natural gas is very important as to meet the sale’s specifications and environmental regulations. It is also a measure to minimize the corrosion effects. The most common process to remove the acid gases is amine process. There are some operating parameters which can be considered to optimize amine sweetening plant such as inlet gas temperature, lean amine circulation rate, lean amine temperature, amine concentration, number of trays and others. The objectives of the project are to study the optimum number of trays of absorber and amine circulation rate in removing acid gases in absorption unit using HYSYS simulator which capable in designing the process. By using HYSYS software, a base case of amine sweetening unit was created and di-ethanolamine (DEA) is used as the amine solvent. Four samples at different concentrations of acid gases were tested. The rules evaluated include 20 trays in the absorber and higher circulation rate. Although these rules of thumb are excellent as the starting points, violating these rules could offer considerable advantages to process efficiency. Depending on the concentration of the acid gases at the feed stream, every situation is different and requires a thorough investigation whether some changes are beneficial or not.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 548-549)
• Pages: 83-89
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.548-549.83
• Online since: April 2014
• Authors: Effah Yahya*, Nur Hashimah Alias, Tengku Amran Tengku Mohd, Ahmad Hilmi Ghazalli
• Keywords: Acid Gases, Amine, Circulation Rate, HYSYS, Natural Gas Process, Number of Trays

References

[1] Kohl, A., & Neilsen, R. (1997). Gas Purification (5th edition ed. ). Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.

[2] Mokhatab, S., Poe, W. A., & Speight, J. G. (2006). Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.

[3] Mearkeltor, K. (2011). Natural gas Sweetening Process Design. School of Doctoral Studies (European Union) Journal, 144-156.

[4] Gas Processors Suppliers Association. (2004). Engineering Data Book. Oklahoma: Gas Processors Suppliers Association.

[5] Ebenezer, S. A. (2005). Removal of Carbon Dioxide From Natural Gas for LNG Production. Trondheim, Norway: Institute of Petroleum Technology Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

[6] Kidnay, A. J., & Parrish, W. R. (2006). Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

[7] Fidler, B. R., Sublette, K. L., Jenneman, G. E., & Bala, G. A. (2003).

[8] Younger, D. A. (2004). Natural Gas Processing Principles and Technology. Calgary, Alberta: Thimm Engineering Inc.

[9] Mackenzie, D. H., Prambil, F. C., Daniels, C. A., & Bullin, J. A. (2006). Design & Operation of a Selective Sweetening Plant Using MDEA. Bryan Research and Engineering, Inc. , 31-36.

[10] Addington, L., & Ness, C. (2010). An Evaluation of General Rules of Thumb, in Amine Sweetening Unit Design and Operation. Bryan Research and Engineering, Inc.

[11] Jamaluddin, A., Bennion, O., & Thomas, F. (1998). Acid/Sour Gas Management in the Petroleum Industry. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 584-598.

DOI: 10.2118/49522-ms

[12] Lunsford, K. M., & Bullin, J. A. (1996). Optimization of Amine Sweetening Units. Proceedings of the 1996 AlChe Spring National Meeting.

[13] Aspen Tech. (2005). Hysys 2004. 2 Operation Guide. Cambridge: Aspen Technology Inc.

[14] Bullin, J. A., Polasek, J. C., & Joseph W. Holmes. (2006). Optimization of New and Existing Amine Gas Sweetening Plants Using Computer Simulation. Bryan Research and Engineering, Inc.

[15] Pandey, M., SPE, & Ltd., O. a. (2005). Process Optimization in Gas Sweetening Unit. International Petroleum Technology Conference.