Management Effectiveness Calculation Model and Method of Government Performance Evaluation

Wen Bin Bu; Yan Li Xu; Jing Liu; Ying Jun Feng

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.55-57.1892

Paper Titles

Parameterized Model Design and Extension for Principal-Agent Incentive Mechanism
p.1869

Research on Compression and Rebounding of the Zoom Air in Sport-Shoes
p.1875

Mechanical Product Concept Extraction Method
p.1880

Preparation and Characterization of Cationic Emulsion of Styrene and Acrylate
p.1886

Management Effectiveness Calculation Model and Method of Government Performance Evaluation
p.1892

Game Analysis between Principal and Agent under Principal-Agency Relationship
p.1898

Dynamic Properties of Hydraulic Excavator’s Simulation and Analysis Based on ADAMS
p.1905

An Improved AHP Model Applied in Supply Chain Management
p.1910

Study on Geological Reserves Calculation Based on 3D Entity Model
p.1917

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 55-57Management Effectiveness Calculation Model and...

Management Effectiveness Calculation Model and Method of Government Performance Evaluation

Abstract:

A new method is presented in this paper in order to depict the effective effort level of the managers in quantity. The concept, model, and specific calculation method of management effectiveness are given through performance evaluation analysis in different time. As an example, government management effectiveness is calculated. The results indicate that this method is fair and effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Recent Trends in Materials and Mechanical Engineering Materials, Mechatronics and Automation

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 55-57)

Pages:

1892-1897

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.55-57.1892

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Wen Bin Bu, Yan Li Xu, Jing Liu, Ying Jun Feng

Keywords:

Management Benefit, Management Effectiveness, Management Frontier, Management Possibility Set

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Mgreta. What is Management. Electronic Industry Publishing House, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978, (2): 429~444.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

Google Scholar

[3] R.D. Banker, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale In-efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science. 1984, 30(9): 1078~1092.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

Google Scholar

[4] K.P. Sharma, P. Leung, H.M. Zaleski. Productive Efficiency of the Swine Industry in Hawaii: Stochastic Frontier vs. Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis. 1997, (8): 447~459.

Google Scholar

[5] K.P. Sharma, P. Leung, H.M. Zaleski. Technical, Allocative and Economic Efficiencies in Swine Production in Hawaii: A Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Approaches, Agricultural Economics. 1999, (20): 23~35.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00548.x

Google Scholar

[6] T. Coelli, S. Perelman. A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Distance Functions: with Application to European Railways, European Journal of Operational Research. 1999, (117): 326~339.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00271-9

Google Scholar

[7] R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, C.A.K. Lovell. Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press. (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] Tim Coelli, Prasada Rao, Battese E. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. (1998).

Google Scholar

[9] C. Liu, H. Hsu, S. Wang, H. Lee. A Performance Evaluation Model Based on AHP and DEA. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers. 2005, 22(3): 243~251.

DOI: 10.1080/10170660509509294

Google Scholar

[10] WEI Quanling. DEA. Science Publishing House, 2006: 170~184.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Kirjavainen, A. L Heikki. Efficiency Differences of Finnish Senior Secondary Schools: An Application of DEA and Tobit Analysis. Economics of Education Review. 1998, 4(17): 377~394.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(97)00048-4

Google Scholar

[12] J. Zhu. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Springer, 2003: 105~122.

Google Scholar

[13] H.J. Gathon, P. Pestieau. Decomposing efficiency into its managerial and its regulatory Dj.M. Maric, P.F. Meier and S.K. Estreicher: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 83-87 (1992), p.119.

Google Scholar