Development of Product Options for Modular Product Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

Modular product development plays an important role in helping manufacturing companies provide product variety rapidly in achieving competitive advantages. The development of product options plays a significant role by providing a selecting list for customizing, and has a key impact on the development of modular products. A process for product options development has been developed to guide the activities of determining product options and their values. And mathematical models have been brought forward to support decision-makings within the proposed process. A prototype system based on this process and mathematical models has been developed and tested in a machine manufacture plant, with satisfactory results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2147-2152

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pine, B. J., 1993, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

DOI: 10.1016/0737-6782(93)90090-d

Google Scholar

[2] Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2002, Modularity, Product Variety, Production Volume, and Component Sourcing: Theorizing Beyond Generic Prescriptions, Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), pp.549-575.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00027-x

Google Scholar

[3] Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, K. B., 1997, Managing in an Age of Modularity, Harvard Business Review, 75(5), pp.84-93.

Google Scholar

[4] Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K. -H., 2007, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer-Verlag London Limited, London.

Google Scholar

[5] Ulrich, K., and Eppinger, S. D., 1995, Product Design and Development, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[6] Raharjo, H., Xie, M., and Brombacher, A. C., 2007, On Innovative Product Design Using Kano Model in Modularized Qfd, " Ismot, 07: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Management of Technology, Vols 1 and 2, pp.490-494.

Google Scholar

[7] Shieh, M. -D., Yan, W., and Chen, C. -H., 2008, Soliciting Customer Requirements for Product Redesign Based on Picture Sorts and Art2 Neural Network, Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), pp.194-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.036

Google Scholar

[8] Xu, Q., Jiao, R. J., Yang, X., Helander, M., Khalid, H. M., and Opperud, A., 2009, An Analytical Kano Model for Customer Need Analysis, Design Studies, 30(1), pp.87-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.001

Google Scholar

[9] Biswas, D., and Grau, S. L., 2008, Consumer Choices under Product Option Framing: Loss Aversion Principles or Sensitivity to Price Differentials?, Psychology & Marketing, 25(5), pp.399-415.

DOI: 10.1002/mar.20217

Google Scholar

[10] Perlich, C., and Rosset, S., 2007, Identifying Bundles of Product Options Using Mutual Information Clustering, SIAM, Minneapolis, Minnersota.

DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611972771.35

Google Scholar

[11] Chan, L. -K., and Wu, M. -L., 2002, Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review, European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), pp.463-497.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00178-9

Google Scholar

[12] Wang, C. H., and Chou, S. Y., 2008, Extracting Variant Product Concepts through Customer Involvement Model, Collaborative Productive and Service Life Cycle Management for a Sustainable World, pp.313-321.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-972-1_30

Google Scholar

[13] Li, Y., Tang, J., Luo, X., and Xu, J., 2009, An Integrated Method of Rough Set, Kano's Model and Ahp for Rating Customer Requirements' Final Importance, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3, Part 2), pp.7045-7053.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.036

Google Scholar

[14] Kong, F. B., Ming, X. G., Wang, L., Wang, X. H., and Wang, P. P., 2009, On Modular Products Development, Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 17(4), pp.291-300.

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x09353974

Google Scholar