Review of Ejection Seat Electronic Program Controller

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ejector seat program controller is the key device unfolded by the separation of the control people-seat and lifesaving parachute after the seat ejection from the machine, which is the main component of seat separation system. Compared with the mechanical program controller, electronic program controller has many advantages: small volume, light weight, time delay of high precision, good flexibility, strong power, easy to expand, the tremendous development potential and splendid testability. This paper respectively introduces the English MK series seats, American ACES series seat and Russian K-36Дseries seat electronic program controller, focusing on the TWZI type electronic program controller developed by China Aviation Life-saving Institute

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

530-534

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Li Rui. Review of MK series ejection seat[J]. Life-saving , 2007. 1.

Google Scholar

[2] R.A. David, et al. Digital Recovery Sequencer- Advanced Concept Ejection Seats[R]. ADA446498, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Yang Dengfang. New ejection seat separation control institution - TWZI electronic program controller. Beijing: the fifth academic essays, China Aviation Institute Human Engineering, medical, life saving air branch, 1998. 07.

Google Scholar

[4] Doyle, J. C., Francis, B. A., and Tannenbaum, A. R., Feedback Control Theory, Macmillan, New York, (1992).

Google Scholar

[5] Anderson, T, F/A-18 Hornet Ground Proximity Warning System Design Report, version 3. 0 rev. A, Strike Aircraft Test Directorate, NAWC/AD, Sept. (1993).

Google Scholar

[6] Pickl, W., Carlson, R., Tarn, W, and Wallace, B, Improving Escape Capsule Performance Using Active Pitch Control, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual SAFE Symposium (Reno, NV), SAFE Association, Cottage Grove, OR, 1994, pp.264-274.

Google Scholar