Numerical Simulation of CPT Cone Penetration in Sand

Article Preview

Abstract:

Numerical simulation of cone penetration in sand is performed by means of a computationally efficient critical state model implemented in an explicit-integration finite element code. Its main advantage, compared to other published studies employing simpler soil models such as the Drucker-Prager, is that sand compressibility can be described with a single set of model parameters, irrespective of the stress level and the sand relative density. Calibration of the constitutive model is based on back-analysis of published centrifuge tests results, and consequently the predictions of the numerical methodology are compared against independent tests. Additional analyses are performed for proposing a new simplified formula to correlate the cone penetration resistance with the in situ sand relative density.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

416-421

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Susila, R.D. Hryciw, Large displacement FEM modelling of the cone penetration test (CPT) in normally consolidated sand, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 27 (2003) 585-602.

DOI: 10.1002/nag.287

Google Scholar

[2] W. Huang, D. Sheng, S.W. Sloan, H.S. Yu, Finite element analysis of cone penetration in cohesionless soil, Computers and Geotechnics 31 (2004) 517-528.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.09.001

Google Scholar

[3] J. Dijkstra, W. Broere, A.F. van Tol, Numerical simulation of the installation of a displacement pile in sand, In: Eds. Pande, Pietruczak, Numerical Models in Geomechanics NUMOG X, Taylor and Francis, 2007, 461-466.

DOI: 10.1201/noe0415440271.ch67

Google Scholar

[4] J. Yi, Centrifuge and numerical modelling of sand compaction pile installation, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore, (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Jamiolkowski, C.C. Ladd, J. T, Germaine, R. Lancellotta, New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils, Theme lecture In: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Soil. Mech. Found. Engng, San Francisco, 1985, 57-156.

Google Scholar

[6] M.D. Bolton, M.W. Gui, J. Garnier, J.F. Corte, G. Bagge, J. Laue, R. Renzi, Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand, Géotechnique, 49 (1999) 543-552.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.543

Google Scholar

[7] G.P. Kouretzis, D. Sheng, D. Wang, Numerical simulation of cone penetration testing using a new critical state constitutive model for sand, submitted to Computers and Geotechnics (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.11.002

Google Scholar

[8] P.A. Vermeer, A double hardening model for sand, Géotechnique 28 (1978) 413-433.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1978.28.4.413

Google Scholar

[9] R. Nova, M.D. Wood, A constitutive model for sand in triaxial compression, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 3 (1979) 255-278.

DOI: 10.1002/nag.1610030305

Google Scholar

[10] Y.F. Dafalias, Bounding surface plasticity. I: mathematical foundation and hypoelasticity, Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 112-EM9 (1986) 966-987.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1986)112:9(966)

Google Scholar

[11] A. Asaoka, M. Nakano, T. Noda, Superloading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behaviour, Soils and Foundations, 40-2 (2000) 99-110.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf.40.2_99

Google Scholar

[12] Abaqus– User's Manual – version 6. 11. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp. (2011).

Google Scholar

[13] M.D. Bolton, M.W. Gui, The study of relative density and boundary effects for cone penetration tests in centrifuge. Report CUED/D-SOILS/TR256, Cambridge University Engineering Department, UK, (1993).

Google Scholar

[14] Y.P. Yao, D.A. Sun, T. Luo, A critical state model for sands dependent on stress and density, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 28 (2004) 323-337.

DOI: 10.1002/nag.340

Google Scholar

[15] D. Loukidis, R. Salgado, Analysis of the shaft resistance of non-displacement piles in sand. Géotechnique, 58-4 (2008) 283-296.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.2008.58.4.283

Google Scholar