A Research of MM-SVM Technique for Fault Diagnosis

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the satellite development of our country, higher accuracy and stability are requires, which makes the control systems becoming more complex and requiring more telemetry parameters. Data mining techniques do not consider the physical relationship between the various components, but use of satellite telemetry parameters of the satellite states the purpose of fault identification. In this paper, we give a model based on multiple support vector machines (MM-SVM) technology satellite fault diagnosis method. The experiment shows that our method is effective in satellite equipment fault diagnosis

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2633-2637

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory[M]. springer, (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] Mao Y, Zhou X, Pi D, et al. Multiclass cancer classification by using fuzzy support vector machine and binary decision tree with gene selection[J]. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2005, 2005(2): 160-171.

DOI: 10.1155/jbb.2005.160

Google Scholar

[3] Suykens J A K, Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers[J]. Neural processing letters, 1999, 9(3): 293-300.

Google Scholar

[4] Monroy I, Benitez R, Escudero G, et al. A semi-supervised approach to fault diagnosis for chemical processes[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2010, 34(5): 631-642.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.12.008

Google Scholar

[5] Freund Y, Schapire R E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting[J]. Journal of computer and system sciences, 1997, 55(1): 119-139.

DOI: 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504

Google Scholar

[6] KLEMA J, NOVAKOVA L, KAREL F, STEPANKOVA O. Sequential data mining: A comparative case study in development of atherosclerosis risk factors, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., 2008, vol. 38, no. 1: 3-15.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcc.2007.906055

Google Scholar

[7] BUDALAKOTI S, SRIVASTAVA A, AKELLA R. Discovering atypical flights in sequences of discrete flight parameters, in Proc. 2006, IEEE Aerospace. Conf., pp: 1-8.

DOI: 10.1109/aero.2006.1656109

Google Scholar

[8] FINK E, PRATT K. B, GANDHI H.S. Indexing of Time Series by Major Minima and Maxima. Proc of the IEEE Int Conf on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Washington. DC: IEEE, 2003: 2332-2335.

DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2003.1244232

Google Scholar

[9] DAVID L. Inductive System Health Monitoring. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IC-AI 04, Volume 2 & Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning; Models, Technologies & Applications, MLMTA , 04, June 21-24, 2004, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

Google Scholar

[10] Berndt Donald J, Clifford James. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series[C]. In Proceedings of the KDD Workshop, Seattle, WA. 1994: 359-370.

Google Scholar

[11] SCHWABACHER M. Machine Learning for Rocket Propulsion Health Monitoring. Proceedings of the SAE World Aerospace Congress, Dallas, TX, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] DAS K, SCHNEIDER J. Detecting anomalous records in categorical datasets. In KDD'07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2007, pp: 220-229.

DOI: 10.1145/1281192.1281219

Google Scholar

[13] DAVID L. I. Data Mining Applications for Space Mission Operations System Health Monitoring, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, 94035, (2008).

Google Scholar

[14] PARK H, MACKEY R, JAMES M, ZAK M, KYNARD M, SEBGHATI J, and GREENE W. Analysis of Space Shuttle Main Engine Data Using Beacon-based Exception Analysis for Multi- Missions. Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, New York, Vol. 6, March 9-16, 2002: 6-2835 - 6-2844.

DOI: 10.1109/aero.2002.1036123

Google Scholar

[15] CHANDOLA V, BANERJEE A, KUMAR V. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 2009, 41(3): 1-58.

DOI: 10.1145/1541880.1541882

Google Scholar