Improvement of Chaotic Signals De-Noising with the Self-Optimizing Method of Wavelet Threshold

Article Preview

Abstract:

For the purpose of improving adaptive performance of chaotic signals de-noising with wavelet transform, a method of Memetic-algorithm-based adaptive wavelet de-noising (MAWD) is presented. The MAWD based on generalized cross validation (GCV) is competent to obtain the global optimum thresholds and to raise the efficiency of adaptive searching computation. The de-noising results of simulative Lorenz time series are presented. The results show that the chaotic signals de-noised by MAWD can remove the white noise more effectively than the signals de-noised by using standard soft threshoding method (STM) and genetic-algorithm-based adaptive wavelet de-noising (GAWD), and the advantages are more apparent under the condition of lower SNR. The Lorenz time series with lower SNR de-noised by MAWD and GAWD respectively are predicted by Volterra adaptive filters, and the results show that the prediction absolute error of Lorenz time series de-noised by MAWD is nearly nine times smaller than that by GAWD. This method has a promising prospect in practical Chaotic signals de-noising.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4950-4954

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Alexander L F, Robin J E. Control of chaos: Methods and applications in engineering[J] . Annual Reviews in Control, 2005, 29( 1) : 33- 56.

Google Scholar

[2] Kostelich E J, Schreiber T. Noise Reduction in Chaotic Time Series: A Survey of Common Methods[J]. Physical Review E (S1063-651X), 1993, 48(3): 1752-1763.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.48.1752

Google Scholar

[3] Yang S P, Zhao Z H. Improved wavelet denoising using neighboring coefficients and its application to machinery diagnosis[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(17): 137-141.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2013.17.137

Google Scholar

[4] Jiang T Y, Li J, Du L, et al. De-Noising for partial discharge signals using PSO adaptive wavelet threshold estimation[J]. Transactions of CHINA electrotechnical society, 2012, 27(5): 77-83.

Google Scholar

[5] Li J, Cheng C K, Jiang T Y, et al. Adaptive thresholding wavelet de-noising for PD signals using Genetic algorithm[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2009, 35(9): 2114-2118.

Google Scholar

[6] MINH N L, YEW-SOON O, Jin Y C. Lamarckian memetic algorithms: local optimum and connectivity structure analysis[J]. Memetic Comp, 2009(1): 175-190.

DOI: 10.1007/s12293-009-0016-9

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang X P, Desai M D. Adaptive denoising based on SURE risk[ J] . IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 1998, 5(10) : 265-267.

DOI: 10.1109/97.720560

Google Scholar

[8] Wang C L, Zhu Y H, Xu C, Yu WG. Application of adaptive wavelet threshold de-noising in metal magnetic memory signal processing[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(8): 1555-1559.

Google Scholar

[9] Peter Merz,Bernd Freisleben. Memetic Algorithms and the Fitness Landscape of the Graph Bi Partitioning Problem[C]. PPSN VLNCS 1998,pp.765-774.

DOI: 10.1007/bfb0056918

Google Scholar

[10] Li S Y. Improved wavelet threshold denoising method and its simulation suing MATLAB[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2010, 30(2): 121-124.

Google Scholar