Analysis of Synergies among the Ecological Factors of Farmland in a Township

Article Preview

Abstract:

The spatial variability of single ecological factors of the farmland and the synergies among the ecological factors were studied by using geostatistical analysis and factorial kriging analysis (FKA).The results show that all of the spherical models of the co-variogram can be grouped into four parts: the nugget part, the small-scale part, the medium-scale part, and the large-scale part. The mean value of the small-scale range (1.12-1.85 km) is approximately 1.50 km, that of the medium-scale range (3.40-4.10 km) is approximately 3.8 km, and that of the large-scale range (9.35-10.10 km) is approximately 9.8 km. The correlations between each factor on the four scales vary, and the correlation between each factor on the medium scale is the strongest. In this paper, the ecological factors of the farmland on the medium scale have relatively consistent variability and sources, indicating that all of the factors on that scale have a high coordination.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

916-920

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.E. Rossi, D.J. Mulla, A.G. Journel and E.H. Franz: Ecological Monographs, Vol. 62(1991), p.277-3l4.

Google Scholar

[2] M.J. Fortin, P. Draperal and P. Legendre: Vegetation, Vol. 83(1989), pp.209-222.

Google Scholar

[3] X.D. Guo, B.J. Fu, K.M. Ma, L.D. Chen and F.L. Yang: Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 11(2000) No. 4, pp.557-563.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Wang, B. J. Fu, Y. Qiu and L. D. Chen: Acta Geographica Sinica, Vol. 55(2000) No. 4, pp.428-437.

Google Scholar

[5] C.M. Stewart, A.B. McBratney and J.H. Skerritt: Prec. Agric, Vol. 3 (2002), pp.155-168.

Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Pringle, A.B. McBratney and S.E. Cook: Prec. Agric, Vol. 5(2004), pp.625-645.

Google Scholar

[7] H.J. Wang, X.Z. Shi, X.W. Li, D.S. Yu,W.X. Su and Z.H. Cao: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Vol. 18(2004) No. 1, 15-18.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Wang, B. J. Fu and Y. Qiu, L. D. Chen and L. Yu: Acta Ecologica Sinica, Vol. 22(2002) No. 8, pp.1173-1178.

Google Scholar

[9] X.Z. Gao K.L. Hu,Y. Guo B.G. Li,W.T. Ma,S. Du and Y.H. Wang: Scientiea Agricultura Sinica, Vol. 35(2002) No. 6, pp.660-666.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Bourennane, B. Nicoullaud, A. Couturier and D. King:Prec. Agric, Vol. 5(2004) No. 5, pp.521-536.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Bocchi, A. Castrignanò, F. Fornaro and T. Maggiore: Eur. J. Agron, Vol. 13(2000)No. 4, pp.295-308.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Castrignanò,L. Giugliarini,R. RisalitiandN. Martinelli: Geoderma, Vol. 97(2000) No. 1-2, pp.39-60.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Matheron: Report N-732( Centre de Geostatistique, Fontainebleau , 1982).

Google Scholar

[14] P. Goovaerts. J. Soil Sci., Vol. 43(1992) No. 4, pp.597-619.

Google Scholar