Effect of Soil Depth on the Quantification of Soil Moisture Content Value Estimated from NOAA Satellite Images

Article Preview

Abstract:

Soil moisture (MC) is considered as the most significant boundary conditions controlling most of the hydrological cycle’s processes especially over humid areas. However, MC is very critical parameter to measure because of its variability in both space and time. The fluctuation of MC along the soil depth in turn, makes it so difficult to assess from optical satellite techniques. The study aims to produce a rectified satellite’s surface temperature (Ts) in order to enhance the spatial estimation of MC. The study also aims to produce MC estimates from three variable depths of the soil using optical images from NOAA 17 in order to examine the potential of satellite techniques in assessing the MC along the soil depths. The universal triangle (UT) algorithm was used for MC assessment based on Ts, vegetation Indices (VI) and field measurements of MC; which were conducted at variable depths. The study area was divided into three classes according to the nature of surface cover. The resultant MC extracted from the UT method with rectified Ts, produced accuracies of MC ranging from 0.65 to 0.89 when validated with in-situ measured MC at depths 5cm and 10 cm respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

705-710

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Zhang and T. J. Crowley, Historical climate records in China and reconstruction of past climates, Journal of Climate, vol. 2, pp.833-849 %@ 0894-8755, (1989).

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<0833:hcrica>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[2] A. A. Hassaballa and A. B. Matori, Study on surface moisture content, vegetation cover and air temperature based on NOAA/AVHRR surface temperatures and field measurements, in National Post Graduate Conference NPC, Malaysia, 2011, pp.1-5.

DOI: 10.1109/natpc.2011.6136367

Google Scholar

[3] J. M. Lanicci, et al., Sensitivity of the Great Plains severe-storm environment to soil-moisture distribution, Monthly Weather Review, vol. 115, pp.2660-2673, (1987).

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2660:sotgps>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[4] R. Bindlish and A. P. Barros, Parameterization of vegetation backscatter in radar-based, soil moisture estimation, Remote Sens Environ, vol. 76, pp.130-137 (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00200-5

Google Scholar

[5] J. D. Hanson, et al., Calibrating the root zone water quality model, Agronomy Journal, vol. 91, pp.171-177 %@ 0002-1962, (1999).

DOI: 10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100020002x

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Su, et al., Preliminary Results of Soil Moisture Retrieval From ESAR (EMAC 94) and ERS-1/SAR, Part II: Soil Moisture Retrieval, 1995, pp.7-19.

Google Scholar

[7] A. A. Hassaballa, et al., Extraction of soil moisture from RADARSAT-1 and its role in the formation of the 6 December 2008 landslide at Bukit Antarabangsa, Kuala Lumpur, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, pp.1-10 %@ 1866-7511, (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s12517-013-0990-6

Google Scholar

[8] H. L. Penman, Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 193, pp.120-145 %@ 1364-5021, (1948).

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1948.0037

Google Scholar

[9] J. E. Christiansen, Pan evaporation and evapotranspiration from climatic data, Proc Amer Soc Civil Eng, J Irrig Drainage Div, vol. 94, pp.243-265, (1968).

DOI: 10.1061/jrcea4.0000568

Google Scholar

[10] K. P. Georgakakos and O. W. Baumer, Measurement and utilization of on-site soil moisture data, Journal of hydrology, vol. 184, pp.131-152 %@ 0022-1694, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02971-0

Google Scholar

[11] JPM, Basic Population Characteristics By Administrative Districts, Kuala Lumpur2010.

Google Scholar

[12] T. N. Carlson, et al., A method to make use of thermal infrared temperature and NDVI measurements to infer surface soil water content and fractional vegetation cover, Remote Sensing Reviews, vol. 9, pp.161-173 %@ 0275-7257, (1994).

DOI: 10.1080/02757259409532220

Google Scholar

[13] R. R. Gillies and T. N. Carlson, Thermal remote sensing of surface soil water content with partial vegetation cover for incorporation into climate models, J. Appl. Meteorol. , vol. 34, pp.745-756 (1995).

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<0745:trsoss>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[14] F. Becker and Z. -L. Li, Temperature-independent spectral indices in thermal infrared bands, Remote sensing of environment, vol. 32, pp.17-33 %@ 0034-4257, (1990).

DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(90)90095-4

Google Scholar

[15] A. A. Hassaballa and A. B. Matori, The estimation of air temperature from NOAA/AVHRR images and the study of NDVI-Ts impact: Case study: The application of split-window algorithms over (Perak Tengah & Manjong) area, Malaysia, in International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace), Malaysia, 2011, pp.20-24.

DOI: 10.1109/iconspace.2011.6015844

Google Scholar

[16] M. S. Moran, et al., Estimating crop water deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral vegetation index, Remote sensing of environment, vol. 49, pp.246-263 %@ 0034-4257, (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)90020-5

Google Scholar

[17] A. A. Van de Griend and M. Owe, On the relationship between thermal emissivity and the normalized difference vegetation index for natural surfaces, Int J Remote Sens vol. 14, pp.1119-1131 (1993).

DOI: 10.1080/01431169308904400

Google Scholar