Measuring Driver’s Percent-Time-Spent-Following Using a Moving Video Recording Technique

Abstract:

The percent time spent following (PTSF) or proportion of following time (PFT) relative to total travel time taken by vehicles to traverse a particular segment of two-lane highways has been used as key performance index for evaluating the level-of-service of the road. From the context of travel time, this implies that PTSF is a space related indicator and thus supposed to be measured over a road segment. However, this indicator is measured in the field based on specific point observation; as equivalent to the percent of vehicles traveling with time headways shorter than 3 s. The accuracy of PTSF estimates based on this approach has been questioned and criticized by many; as spot measured values may not to be real representative of segment estimates. This paper presents an exploration into the application of moving video recording technique for PTSF measurement. PTSF was estimated based on test vehicle following time on two-lane highways using moving car observer method as an alternative approach for field measurement of the indicator along road segment as opposed the existing practice of spot measurement and assumed representative of long segment. Findings from this work demonstrate that the approach used in this study is promising for field measurement of PTSF; as estimates obtained relate well with the major vehicle’s following cause factors.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 567)
• Pages: 736-741
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.736
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Na’iya Ibrahim Muttaka*, Othman Bin Chepuan
• Keywords: Following Time, PTSF, Test Vehicle, Two-Lane Highways, Video Recording Technique

References

[1] TRB. Highway Capacity Manual, 5th Ed. 2010: National Research Council, Washington, D. C.

[2] Al-Kaisy, A. and C. Durbin. Estimating Percent Time Spent Following on Two-Lane Highways: Field Evaluation of New Methodologies, in Presented at the Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, January 21-25, 2007, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C.

DOI: 10.3141/1776-07

[3] Dixon, M.P., S.S.K. Sarepali, and K.A. Young. Field Evaluation of Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Analysis Procedures for Two-Lane Highways. Transportation Research Record: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002. 1802(2002).

DOI: 10.3141/1802-15

[4] Luttinen, R.T. Capacity and Level of Service on Finnish Two-Lane Highways, in Helsinki 2001, Finnish Road Administration, Traffic and Road Engineering, Finnra Reports 18/20012001: Helsinki, Finland.

[5] HPU. Malaysian Highway Capacity Manual 2011: Highway Planning Unit, Ministry of Works, Malaysia.

[6] Polus, A. and M. Cohen. Theoretical and Empirical Relationships for the Quality of Flow and for a New Level of Service on Two-Lane Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 2009. 135(6): pp.380-385.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2009)135:6(380)

[7] Polus, A. and M. Cohen. Estimating percent-time-spent-following on two-lane rural highways. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011. 19(6): pp.1319-1325.

DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.03.001

[8] Van As, C. and A. Van Niekerk. South African Highway Capacity Research, in TRB Workshop 153, 2007, South African National Roads Agency, Limited.

[9] Al-Kaisy, A. and C. Durbin. Evaluating new methodologies for estimating performance on two-lane highways. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, NRC Research Press, 2008. 35(8): pp.777-785.

DOI: 10.1139/l08-020

[10] Robbertson, H.D. and D.J. Findley. Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies. 2nd ed. 2010: Institute of Transportation Engineers.

[11] Roger, P.R., S.P. Elena, and R.S. William. Traffic Engineering, 3rd Ed. 2004, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

[12] Mortimer, W. Moving Vehicle Method for Estimating Traffic Volumes and Speeds. Highway Research Board Bulletin 156, Highway Research Board, Washington DC, (1957).