Reliability Analysis in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

The performance-based engineering approach, as opposed to prescriptive rules of code-based design, is based on simulation of real structural behavior. Reliability of the expected performance state is assessed by using various methodologies based on finite element nonlinear static pushover analysis and specialized reliability software package. Reliability approaches that were considered included full coupling with an external finite element code based methods in conjunction with either first order reliability method or importance sampling method. The building considered in the actual study has been designed against seismic hazard according to the Moroccan code RPS2000.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1581-1590

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] OC. Celik and BR. Ellingwood: Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety, Vol. 32 ( 2010), p.1–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003

Google Scholar

[2] BA. Bradley and DS. Lee: Accuracy of approximate methods of uncertainty propagation in seismic loss estimation. Structural Safety, Vol. 32 (2010), pp.13-24.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.001

Google Scholar

[3] D. Asprone, F. Jalayer, A. Prota and G. Manfredi: Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi- hazard risk assessment of structures in seismic zones subjected to blast for the limit state of collapse. Structural Safety , Vol. 32 ( 2010), p.25–34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.002

Google Scholar

[4] AB. Liel, CB. Haselton, GG. Deierlein and JW. Baker: Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Structural Safety, Vol. 31 ( 2009), p.197–211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.002

Google Scholar

[5] O. Möller, RO. Foschi, LM. Quiroz and M. Rubinstein: Structural optimization for performance- based design in earthquake engineering: Applications of neural networks. Structural Safety 2009,Vol. 31 ( 2009), p.490–499.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.007

Google Scholar

[6] V. Piluso, G. Rizzano and I. Tolone I: Seismic reliability assessment of a two-story steel-concrete composite frame designed according to Eurocode 8. Structural Safety, Vol. 31 (2009), pp.383-395.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.01.001

Google Scholar

[7] RJ. Williams, P. Gardoni and JM. Bracci: Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures. Structural Safety, Vol. 31 (2009), pp.188-196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.017

Google Scholar

[8] L. Berto, R. Vitaliani, A. Saetta and P. Simioni: Seismic assessment of existing RC structures affected by degradation phenomena. Structural Safety, Vol. 31 (2009), pp.284-297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.09.006

Google Scholar

[9] J. Song and WH. Kang: System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method. Structural Safety, Vol. 31 (2009), pp.148-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.012

Google Scholar

[10] A. Der Kiureghian and RL. Taylor: Numerical methods in structural reliability. In G. Augusti, A. Borri and G. Vannucchi, editors: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering. ICASP4, Bologna: Pitagora Ed.ITALIE, (1983),pp.36-225.

Google Scholar

[11] PL. Liu and A. Der Kiureghian: Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Structural Safety, Vol. 9(3) (1991), pp.78-161.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7

Google Scholar

[12] M. Gutierrez, J. Carmeliet and R. de Borst: Finite element reliability methods using diana. In: Kusters GMA, Hendriks MAN, editors. Diana Computational Mechanics, Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, (1994), pp.64-255.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1046-4_24

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Zhang and A. Der Kiureghian, in: Finite Element Reliability Methods for Inelastic Structures. Report No. UCB/SEMM-97/05, Berkeley: University of California, (1997).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Der Kiureghian and Y. Zhang: Space-variant finite element reliability analysis. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, Vol. 168 (1999), pp.173-183.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(98)00139-x

Google Scholar

[15] B. Sudret and A. Der Kiureghian, in: Stochastic finite element methods and reliability. a State-of- the-Art report, Report No. UCB/SEMM-2000/08, Berkeley: University of California, (2000).

Google Scholar

[16] K. Imai and DM. Frangopol: Geometrically nonlinear finite element reliability analysis of structural systems. i: theory, ii: applications. Computers and Structures. Vol. 77(6) (2000), pp.677-709.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(00)00011-0

Google Scholar

[17] A. Haldar and S. Mahadevan, in: Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, (2000).

Google Scholar

[18] C. Frier and J. Sorensen: Stochastic finite element analysis of non-linear structures modelled by plasticity theory. In: A. Der Kiureghian, S. Madanat and J. Pestana. editors. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP9, Rotterdam: Millpress. (2003), pp.90-283.

Google Scholar

[19] T. Haukaas and A. Der Kiureghian, in: Finite Element Reliability and Sensitivity Methods for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. PEER Report 2003/14, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, (2004).

Google Scholar

[20] Règlement de construction parasismique RPS 2000. Ministère de l'ATUHE, Secrétariat d'État à l'Habitat, Kingdom of Morocco, (2001).

Google Scholar

[21] Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, ASCE, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, (2000).

DOI: 10.1007/springerreference_225387

Google Scholar

[22] A. Der Kiureghian and M. DeStefano, in:"Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability." JOURNAL of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE. Vol. 117(12) (1991), pp.2923-2904.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1991)117:12(2904)

Google Scholar

[23] O. Ditlevsen and H.O. Madsen, in: Structural Reliability Methods. Wiley, Chichester, New York: NY,(1996).

Google Scholar

[24] R. E. Melchers, in: Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester: 2nd edition, (1999).

Google Scholar

[25] T.V. Santosh et al: Optimum step length selection rule in modified HL-RF method for structural reliability. Pressure Vessels and Piping. Vol. 83 (2006), pp.742-748.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.004

Google Scholar