The Capacitive Soil Moisture Sensor Research

Article Preview

Abstract:

To meet the requirements of a large-scale soil moisture monitoring system, this dissertation developed a new type of capacitive soil moisture sensor based on the detection and amplification of the singal peak-to-peak value named PA-1 sensor. PA-1 sensor was calibrated and evaluated under static laboratory conditions. A new type of soil moisture sensor named PA-1 is developed, which is based on the relationship between soil moisture and soil relative permittivity. Circuit design, operating features and exterior design of the sensor are introduced. PA-1 is calibrated in solution samples using the standard calibration method. Calibration experiment results show that PA-1 has a very linear measurement curve. The performance of PA-1 is studied and compared to the widely used Decagon Company’s EC-5 capacitive soil moisture sensor. Experiment results show that PA-1 has advantages of high sensitivity, low temperature drift, strong tolerance to electromagnetic interference and low power consumption. Keywords: sensor, Precision Agriculture, low temperature drift, low power consumption.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2142-2149

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Rush W. 10 emerging technologies that will change the world [J]. Technology Review, 2003, 106(1): 33-49.

Google Scholar

[2] Arici T, Altunbasak Y. Adaptive sensing for environment monitoring using wireless sensor networks [C]. Proceedings of the Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2004 WCNC 2004 IEEE, IEEE, 2004: 2347-2352.

DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2004.1311455

Google Scholar

[3] Feng W-c. Securing wireless communication in heterogeneous environments [C]. Proceedings of the Military Communications Conference, 2002 MILCOM 2002 IEEE, IEEE, 2002: 1101-1106.

DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2002.1179631

Google Scholar

[4] Arumugam R, Subramanian V, Minai A A. Scribe: Self-organized contention and routing in intelligent broadcast environments [C]. Proceedings of the Military Communications Conference, 2003 MILCOM 2003 IEEE, IEEE, 2003: 567-572.

DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2003.1290166

Google Scholar

[5] Doumit S, Agrawal D P. Bio-inspired mobility in environment aware wireless sensor networks [C]. Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Citeseer, 2003: 514-517.

DOI: 10.1109/percom.2003.1192782

Google Scholar

[6] Kitić G, Crnojević-Bengin V. A Sensor for the Measurement of the Moisture of Undisturbed Soil Samples [J]. Sensors, 2013, 13(2): 1692-1705.

DOI: 10.3390/s130201692

Google Scholar

[7] Jones S B, Blonquist J, Robinson D, et al. Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors Part 1. Methodology [J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2005, 4(4): 1048-1058.

DOI: 10.2136/vzj2004.0140

Google Scholar

[8] Kaatze U, Kettler M, Pottel R. Dielectric relaxation spectrometry of mixtures of water with isopropoxy-and isobutoxyethanol. Comparison to unbranched poly (ethylene glycol) monoalkyl ethers [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1996, 100(6): 2360-2366.

DOI: 10.1021/jp9523783

Google Scholar

[9] Schwank M, Green T R, Mätzler C, et al. Laboratory characterization of a commercial capacitance sensor for estimating permittivity and inferring soil water content [J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2006, 5(3): 1048-1064.

DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0009

Google Scholar

[10] Bogena H, Huisman J, Oberdörster C, et al. Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 344(1): 32-42.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.032

Google Scholar

[11] Devices D. EC-20, EC-10, EC-5 Soil Moisture Sensors User's Manual [M]. (2008).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Poduri and G. S. Sukhatme, Constrained coverage for mobile sensor networks, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2004.1307146

Google Scholar