Effect of Rolling Velocity and Maximum Hertzian Pressure on Fluid Film in Steady State EHL Line Contact with Rough Surface and Linear Piezoviscosity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Consideration of surface roughness in steady state EHL line contact is the first step towards understanding the lubrication of rough surface problem. Current paper investigates the use of sinusoidal waviness in the contact; more precisely it gives performance of real fluid in EHL line contact. The effect of various parameters like rolling velocity (U) and maximum Hertzian pressure (ph) on surface roughness by using properties of linear and exponential piezo-viscosity is taken into consideration to evaluate behavior of pressure distribution of load carrying fluid film and film thickness. Full isothermal, Newtonian simulation of EHL problem gives described effects. Spiking or fluctuation of pressure and film thickness curves is expected to show presence of irregularities on the surface chosen and amount of fluctuation depends on certain parameters and intensity of irregularities present. Rolling side domain of-4.5 ≤ X ≤ 1.5 with grid size ∆X=0.01375 is selected. A computer code is developed to solve Reynolds equation, which governs the generation of pressure in the lubricated contact zone is discritized and solved along with load balance equation using Newton-Raphson technique.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1371-1375

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Kumar, S. Bair, I. Krupka and M. Hartl, Newtonian quantitative elastohydrodynamic film thickness with linear piezoviscosity. Tribology International. 43 (2010) 2159–2165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2010.06.005

Google Scholar

[2] K.R. Harris, R. Malhotra and L.A. Woolf, Temperature and density dependence of the viscosity of octane and toluene, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data. 42 (1997) 1254–1260.

DOI: 10.1021/je970105q

Google Scholar

[3] P. Anuradha and P. Kumar, EHL line contact central and minimum film thickness equations for lubricants with linear piezo-viscous behaviour, Tribology International. 44 (2011) 2157–2160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.05.009

Google Scholar

[4] W. Chengwei and Z. Linqing, An Average Reynolds Equation for Partial Film Lubrication with a Contact Factor, ASME Journal of Tribology. 111 (1989) 188-191.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3261872

Google Scholar

[5] H. Christensen, Stochastic Models for Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 184 (1970) 1013-1026.

Google Scholar

[6] H.G. Elrod, Thin Film Lubrication Theory for Newtonian Fluids with Surfaces Possessing Striated Roughness or Grooving, ASME Journal of Tribology. 95 (1973) 484-489.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3451862

Google Scholar

[7] C.C. Kweh, M.J. Patching, H.P. Evans and R.W. Snidle, Simulation of Elastohydrodynamic Contacts Between Rough Surfaces, ASME Journal of Tribology. 114 (1992) 412-419.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2920900

Google Scholar

[8] A.A. Lubrecht, W.E. Napel and R. Bosma, The Influence of Longitudinal and Transverse Roughness on Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Circular Contacts, ASME Journal of Tribology. 110 (1889) 421-426.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3261645

Google Scholar

[9] N. Patir and H.S. Cheng, An Average Flow Model for Determining the Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication, ASME Journal of Tribology. 100 (1978) 12-17.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3453103

Google Scholar

[10] C.H. Venner and W.E. Napel, Surface Roughness Effects in EHL Line Contacts, ASME Journal of Tribology. 114 (1992) 616-622.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2920926

Google Scholar