Developing Empirical Relationships to Predict Tensile Properties of Friction Welded AISI 52100 Grade Steel Rods

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, friction welding of AISI 52100 grade steel rods of 12 mm diameter was investigated to predict the value of tensile strength. The Joints made with various process parameter combinations were subjected to tensile tests. The primary process parameters are considered in ratios (friction pressure/friction time, forging pressure/forging time, rotational speed/sec). This is done to make as three factors. Here, the three factors, five levels, central composite, rotatable design matrix are worn to optimize the required number of experiments. The Empirical relationships were developed by Response Surface Method (RSM). The adequacy of the models was checked through ANOVA technique. Through using the developed Empirical relationship, Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of the joints can be predicted by means of 95% confidence level.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

144-147

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] MuminSahin H., ErolAkata, TurgutGulmez. 2007, Characterization of mechanical properties in AISI 1040 parts welded by friction welding, Materials Characterization. J. 58 p.1033–1038.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.09.008

Google Scholar

[2] Tylecote R.V., 1968, The solid phase welding of metals" London: Edward Arnold (Publisher) Ltd. 1968, p.1–150.

Google Scholar

[3] Dunkerton S.B., 1986 Toughness properties of friction welds in steels, Welding Journal August. J., p.193–201.

Google Scholar

[4] Akata, E.H., Sahin, H., 2003, An investigation on the effect of dimensional differences in friction welding of AISI 1040 specimens, Industrial Lubricants Tribology J. 55(5) p.223–32.

DOI: 10.1108/00368790310488887

Google Scholar

[5] Sahin M., Akata, H.E., 2003, joining with friction welding of plastically deformed steel, Journal of Material Processing Technology, J. 142(1), p.239–46.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00589-2

Google Scholar

[6] Sahin M., H E Akata H.E., 2004, An experimental study on friction welding of medium carbon and austenitic stainless steel components, Industrial Lubricants Tribology, J. 2004, 56(2) p.122–9.

DOI: 10.1108/00368790410524074

Google Scholar

[7] Babu S., Elangovan K., Balasubramanian, V., Balasubramanian M., 2009, Optimizingfrictionstir welding parameters to maximize tensile strength of AA2219 aluminium alloy joint Metals and Materials Internationals, 15 (2) p.321–30.

DOI: 10.1007/s12540-009-0321-3

Google Scholar

[8] Rajakumar S., Balasubramanian V., 2010, Optimization of the friction-stir-welding process and tool parameters to attain a maximum tensile strength of AA7075-T6aluminium alloy, Journal of Engg. Manufacture, 2010; 224 p.1175–91.

DOI: 10.1243/09544054jem1802

Google Scholar

[9] Palanikumar K., Karthikeyan R., 2006, Assessment of factors influencing surface roughness on the machining of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites" Materials and Design, 27, PP 862–871.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.011

Google Scholar

[10] Duffin F.D., and Bahrani A.S., 1973, Frictional behavior of mild steel in friction welding, Wear, 1973, 2653-74.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(73)90150-6

Google Scholar

[11] Balasubramanian M, Jayabalan V, Balasubramanian V. A mathematical model to predict impact toughness of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welded titanium alloy. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 35(9/10): 852-858.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0763-4

Google Scholar

[12] Murti K G., Sunderesan S., Structure and properties of friction welds between high-speed steel and medium carbon steel for bimetal tools. Material Science and Techno lodge. 1986, 2: 865−870.

DOI: 10.1179/mst.1986.2.8.865

Google Scholar

[13] Shew Y.W., Kwong C.K., 2002, Optimizations of the plated through hole process using experimental design and response surface methodology, International journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 20, 758–64.

DOI: 10.1007/s001700200235

Google Scholar