Effect of Offset Distance on Cutting Forces and Heat Generation in Multi-Tool Turning Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Productivity enhancement assumes a paramount importance in today’s competitive industrial world. The aim of this work is to improve productivity in a conventional lathe with two single point cutting tools machining a workpiece simultaneously. An additional tool holding fixture is fabricated and integrated so that distance between the two cutting tools can be varied and has a provision to provide individual depth of cut. Experiments were performed on gray cast iron workpiece at different offset distances between the cutting tools, at a particular cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut. In the multi-tool turning process, lagging rear cutting tool experiences lesser cutting force than leading front cutting tool. This behaviour is due to the machining of front cutting tool preheat as well as reduction of effective cutting speed while machining with rear cutting tool. With increase in offset distance, moment acting on the work piece contributes to increase in resistance against machining and hence front tool experiences higher force than rear cutting tool.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

211-215

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.A. Kishawya, M. Dumitrescub, E.G. Ng and M.A. Elbestawi, Effect of coolant strategy on tool performance, chip morphology and surface quality during high-speed machining of A356 aluminum alloy, Int. J. Mach. Tools Mf. 45 (2005) 219-227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.07.003

Google Scholar

[2] R. B. Dasilva, A.R. Machado, E.O. Ezugwu, J. Bonney and W. F. Sales, Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213 (2013) 1459-1464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.008

Google Scholar

[3] U. Heisel and M. Gringel, Machine Tool Design Requirements for High-Speed Machining, Ann. CIRP, Mfg Techno. 45 (1996) 389-392.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63087-x

Google Scholar

[4] B. Bossmanns and J. F. Tu, Conceptual Design of Machine Tool Interfaces for HighSpeed Machining, J. Manuf. Processes. 41 (2002) 16-27.

DOI: 10.1016/s1526-6125(02)70130-8

Google Scholar

[5] T.M.E.I. Hossainny, Enhancement of surface quality using a newly developed technique in turning operations, Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture, 224 (2009) 1389-1397.

DOI: 10.1243/09544054jem1735

Google Scholar

[6] G. Urbikain, L.N.L. D Lacalle, F.J. Campa, A. Fernandez and A. Elias, Stability prediction in straight turning of a flexible workpiece by collocation method, Int. J. Mach. Tools Mf. 54-55 (2012) 73-81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.11.008

Google Scholar

[7] L. Kops, M. Gould and M. Mirach, Improved Analysis of the Workpiece Accuracy in Turning, Based on the Emerging Diameter, Trans. ASME J. Engng for Ind. 115 (1993) 253-257.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2901657

Google Scholar

[8] A.V. Phan, L. Baron, J.R.R. Mayer and G. Cloutier, Finite element and experimental studies of diametral errors in cantilever bar turning, Appl. Math. Modelling. 27 (2003) 221-232.

DOI: 10.1016/s0307-904x(02)00122-1

Google Scholar

[9] E. M. McCollogh, Economics of Multitool Lathe Operations Trans. ASME J. Engng for Ind. (1963) 402-404.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Zompi, R. Levi and G. L. Ravignan, Multi-Tool Machining Analysis Part 1 Tool Failure Patterns and Implications, Trans. ASME J. Engng for Ind. 101 (1979) 230-236.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3439500

Google Scholar

[11] G.L. Ravignani, A. Zompi and R. Levi, Multi-Tool Machining Analysis Part 2 Economic Evaluation in view of Tool Life Scatter, Trans. ASME J. Engng for Ind. 101 (1979) 237-240.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3439501

Google Scholar

[12] K. Sheikh, L. A. Kendall, and S. M. Pandit, Probabilistic Optimization of Multitool Machining Operations", ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry Trans. ASME J. Engng for Ind. 102 (1980) 239-246.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3183859

Google Scholar

[13] N. K. Jha, Optimizing the Number of Tools and Cutting Parameters in Multi-tool Turning for Multiple Objective through Geometric Programming, Appl. Math. Modelling. 10 (1986) 162-170.

DOI: 10.1016/0307-904x(86)90041-7

Google Scholar

[14] L. Tang, R. G. Landers, and S. N. Balakrishnan, Parallel Turning Process Parameter Optimization Based on Novel Heuristic Approach, ASME, J. of Manu Sc and Engng. 130 (2008) 031002-1-031002-12.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2823077

Google Scholar

[15] M. Yatin, V. Ramanuj, D. K. Sarma, and S. Senthilvelan, Design of attachment tool for Multi-tool turning, International conference on Processing and Fabrication of Advance Materials (2012) 195-204.

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Matsumoto, Workpiece temperature rise during the cutting of AISI 4340 steel, Wear 116 (1987) 309-317.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(87)90179-7

Google Scholar