Rumor Propagation Model for Complex Network with Non-Uniform Propagation Rates

Article Preview

Abstract:

Considering propagation characteristics and affecting factors of rumor in real-world complex networks, this paper described different propagation rates of different nodes by introducing the rumor acceptability function. Based on mean-field theory, this paper presented a rumor propagation model with non-uniform propagation rate, and then simulated the behaviour of rumor propagation on scale-free network and calculated the propagation thresholds by corresponding dynamics equation. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that nodes with different rumor acceptability could lead to slowing the spread of rumors, make positive propagation threshold arise, and effectively contain the outbreak and reduce the risk of rumors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

868-872

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Brooks, Advanced Dynamic Modeling of Economic and Social Systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 49-60, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] D.J. Daley, & D.G. Kendall, Nature Science, 204, 1464-3634, (1964).

Google Scholar

[3] D.J. Watts, & S.H. Strogatz, Nature, 393(4), 440-442, (1998).

Google Scholar

[4] A.L. Barabási, & R. Albert, Science, 286(5439), 509-512, (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] D.H. Zanetee, Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 309, 1-l0, (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] D.H. Zanette, Physical Review E, 65(4), 041908, (2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Moreno, M. Nekovee, & A.F. Pacheco, Physical Review E, 69(6), 066130, (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] M. Nekovee, Y. Moreno, G. Bianconi, & M. Marsili, Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 374(1), 457-470, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.07.017

Google Scholar

[9] X.F. Wang, Z.F. Pan, & X. Li, Journal of System Simulation, 18(8), 2346-2348, (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Funk, M. Salathé, & V.A.A. Jansen, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(50), 1247-1256, (2010).

Google Scholar

[11] M.E. J Newman, Nature Physics, 8(1), 25-31, (2011).

Google Scholar

[12] P. Pastor-Satorras, & C. Castellano, Physical Review Letters, 105(21), 218701, (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] M.A. Buice, & C.C. Chow, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2013(03), P03003, (2013).

DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2013/03/p03003

Google Scholar

[14] C.I. Del Genio, T. Gross, & K.E. Bassler, Physical Review Letters, 107(17), 178701, (2011).

Google Scholar