Exit Geometry Effect on Jet Mixing

Article Preview

Abstract:

An elliptical nozzle of 3:1 aspect ratio (AR) issuing a Mach 1.5 jet has been used to investigate its mixing promoting efficiency under over-expanded and under-expanded conditions at the nozzle exit. Azimuthal asymmetry of the elliptical shape is interpreted as a benefit to the mixing process, which is significantly enhanced in comparison to an equivalent circular jet under identical conditions. The elliptical jet decays faster than its circular counterpart throughout the jet field. It is found that continuous variation in the size of the mixing promoting vortices shed from the nozzle exit, as a result of its azimuthal asymmetry, is responsible for faster decay of elliptical jet. The visualization of elliptic jet corroborates the fact that the waves prevailing in the elliptical jet are significantly weaker than those in the circular jet.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

151-155

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rathakrishnan, E. Applied Gas Dynamics, John Wiley, NJ, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] Takama Y, Suzuki K and Rathakrishnan. E. 2008. Visualization and size measurement of vortex shed by flat and arc plates in an uniform flow. IREASE, Vol. 1, pp.55-60.

Google Scholar

[3] Rathakrishnan, E. Experimental Studies on the Limiting Tab. AIAA Journal, Vol. 47, No. 10, 2009, pp.2475-2485.

DOI: 10.2514/1.43790

Google Scholar

[4] Zaman KBMQ. 1996. Axis-switching and spreading of an asymmetric jet: the role of coherent structure dynamics. J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 316, p.1–27.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096000420

Google Scholar

[5] Gutmark EJ, Grinstein FF. 1999. Flow control with noncircular jets. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 31, No. 1, p.239–272.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.239

Google Scholar

[6] Tam CKW. 1995. Supersonic jet noise. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 27, p.17–43.

Google Scholar