Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Machining Parameters Based on Surface Roughness Prediction for AA6061

Article Preview

Abstract:

Surface roughness is strongly affected by machining parameters. In the past few decades, many researchers have established the relationship between the surface roughness and machining parameters, but less attention has been paid to tool shape and geometry. In addition, the number of tool flutes was ignored, which affects in vibrations and machining system. Therefore, this study first-time includes the tool flutes in addition to cutting speed, depth of cut and feed rate as independent variables. Firstly, a set of machining experiments were conducted using AA6061 as a work piece material to provide original data. Response Surface Model (RSM) adopted to establish the relationship model of surface roughness and machining parameters using Minitab 16. Based on analysis of variance (ANOVA), the results show cutter flutes has higher significant followed by feed rate, depth of cut and cutting speed which has less significant. Finally, machining parameters were optimized to desired surface roughness, and optimization prediction error has limited values between-0.02 and 0.02μm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

181-188

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Benardos, P. G, Vosniakos, G. C: Prediction surface roughness in machining - review. International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture. 43, 833-844(2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00059-2

Google Scholar

[2] Aruna. M, Dhanlaksmi. V: Design Optimization of Cutting Parameters when Turning Inconel 718 with Cermet Inserts, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 61: 952-955(2012).

Google Scholar

[3] Ahmed Murat: Optimization of Process Parameters with Minimum Surface Roughness in the Pocket Machining of AA5083 Aluminum Alloy via Taguchi Method. Arab Journal of Science and Engineering. 38: 705–714(2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-012-0372-5

Google Scholar

[4] Noordin. M, Venkatesh. V et al. : Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 145(1): 46–58(2004).

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00861-6

Google Scholar

[5] D. Singh, P. V. Rao A: surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 32(11-12): 1115–1124(2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0429-2

Google Scholar

[6] Boothroyd G, Knight WA: Fundamentals of machining and machine tools Marcel Dekker Inc, New York (1989).

Google Scholar

[7] Dagnal H: Exploring surface texture Rank Taylor, Habson corp, England (1986).

Google Scholar

[8] Huang BP, Chen JC: Artificial –Neural Network Based surface roughness Pokayoke system for end milling operations. Neuro computing 71: 544-549 (2008) doi 10. 1061.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2007.07.029

Google Scholar

[9] Öktem H: An integrated study of surface roughness for end milling modeling and optimization of cutting parameters during operation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologyl. 43: 852-861(2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1763-3

Google Scholar

[10] Kim, J.D.; Kang, Y. H: High-speed machining of aluminum using diamond end mills. International Journal of Machine Tools Manufacturing. 37(8), 1155–1165(1997).

Google Scholar

[11] Yang, J.L.; Chen, J. C: A systematic approach for identifying optimum surface roughness performance in end milling operations. Journal of Industrial Technology. 17(2): 1–8(2001).

Google Scholar

[12] Brezocnik, M.; Kovacic, M.; Ficko, M: Prediction of surface roughness with genetic programming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 157–158, 28–36(2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.004

Google Scholar

[13] Montgomery DC: Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edition. Wiley, New York. (2009) ISBN 978-0-470-39882-1.

Google Scholar

[14] Box GEP, Draper NR: Response surface, mixtures, and ridge analysis, 2nd edition. Wiley-Inter science, Hoboken. (2007) ISBN 978-0- 470-05357-7.

Google Scholar