The Influence of Particle Diameter on Analytical Results

Article Preview

Abstract:

In analytical chemistry, particle diameter is very important during the sample preparation. A model is presented describing the effects of particle diameter on the content of analyte determines the size of the particle; and the particle size determines the weight of samples and relative standard deviation in the results. This new methodology for the optimisation of physical sample preparation is applied for the first time. Based on this relationship, we can find an extensive application in analytical chemistry.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

196-200

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mitra, S. Sample preparation techniques in analytical chemistry, A John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] Walsh, M. E., Ramsey, C. A. & Jenkins, T. F. The effect of particle size reduction by grinding on subsampling variance for explosives residues in PVC. Chemosphere 49 (2002), 1267-1273.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00528-3

Google Scholar

[3] Gustavsson, B., Luthbom, K. & Lagerkvist, A. Comparison of analytical error and sampling error for contaminated PVC. Journal of Hazardous Materials B138 (2006), 252–260.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.082

Google Scholar

[4] Harvey, D. Modern analytical chemistry, The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] Gy, P. Sampling of discrete materials—a new introduction to the theory of sampling I. Qualitative approach. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 74(2004), 7– 24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7439(04)00167-4

Google Scholar

[6] Gy, P. Sampling of discrete materials II. Quantitative approach—sampling of zero-dimensional objects. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 74 (2004), 25– 38.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7439(04)00166-2

Google Scholar

[7] Gy, P. Sampling of discrete materials III. Quantitative approach—sampling of one-dimensional objects. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 74 (2004), 39– 47.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7439(04)00165-0

Google Scholar

[8] Gy, P. Part IV: 50 years of sampling theory—a personal history. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 74(2004), 49– 60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.05.014

Google Scholar

[9] Geelhoed, B. Is Gy's formula for the fundamental sampling error accurate? Experimental evidence. Minerals Engineering 24 (2011), 169–173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.11.005

Google Scholar

[10] Heikka, R. Comparison of two sampling theories to calculate the integration error for one-dimensional processes. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 33 (1996), 147-157.

DOI: 10.1016/0169-7439(95)00091-7

Google Scholar

[11] Gerlach, R. W., Nocerino, J. M., Ramsey, C. A. & Venner, B. C. Gy sampling theory in environmental studies. Analytica Chimica Acta 490(2003), 159–168.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(03)00568-3

Google Scholar

[12] Petersen, L., Minkkinen, P. & Esbensen, K. H. Representative sampling for reliable data analysis: theory of sampling. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 77 (2005), 261– 277.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.09.013

Google Scholar