Network Security Behavior Recognition Based on Consensus Decision-Making Feature Selection

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to the large amount of network data and complex representation, traditional network security behavior recognition system always leads to high redundancy and dimension, resulting in taking up more resources, larger computation. To solve this problem, we do the features selection. This article presents a consensus decision-making method, which combines current famous feature selection algorithms to obtain a more reasonable result and to sort the features in order of importance to facilitate the appropriate selection of features under different conditions. With this method tested on SVM (Support Vector Machine) as classification algorithm, it proves that the algorithm effectively improves the recognition accuracy with fewer features and performs better in terms of result stability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2188-2194

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L Yuancheng, L Pan and J Runhai: Information Networking and Automation (ICINA) Vol. 2 (2010), pp.264-267.

DOI: 10.1109/icina.2010.5636736

Google Scholar

[2] Chen You, Cheng Xueqi, Li Yang and Dai Lei: Journal of Software. Vol. 18 (2007), pp.1639-1651. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] L Xiang, Q Feng, Xu Dan and Qiu Xue-song: Communications (ICC) (2011), pp.1-5.

Google Scholar

[4] Yang Haifeng, Liu Yuan, Xie Zhenping and Ding Xuedong: Journal of Computer Research and Development Vol. 50 (2013), pp.1836-1842.

Google Scholar

[5] Wang Qi'an and Chen Bing: Joutnal of Computer Research and Development Vol. 49 (2012), pp.974-982. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang Qinglin: Computer Engineering and Applications Vol. 47 (2011), pp.18-22.

Google Scholar

[7] Tan B C Y, Teo H H and Wei K K: Information & management Vol. 28 (1995), pp.251-259.

Google Scholar

[8] Romme A G L: Organization Science Vol. 15 (2004), pp.704-718.

Google Scholar