Comprehensive Evaluation of Drill Wear Based on the Model of Projection Pursuit

Article Preview

Abstract:

To overcome the deviation caused by the effect of subjective factors in drill wear evaluation, and make the evaluation more accurate and objective, on the basis of drill wear comprehensive evaluation criterion, the projection data are built with projection pursuit method. Two hundred drill wear comprehensive evaluation samples are randomly generated within the range of each class. The projection pursuit model is built by unitary processing according to these samples, which converts the evaluation into non-linear multi-constrained optimization problems. The optimal projection direction vector and the weight coefficient of each evaluation index are obtained with composite simplex method. Meanwhile the corresponding relationship between the region of variation of projection eigenvalue and classification grade is established. The precision of sample evaluation reaches 100% and the evaluation of the measured data achieves good effect. Thus, the scientific evaluation of drill wear is realized by the projection pursuit model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

272-276

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Y. Li, M.S. Yan, Q. L. Yuan. Tool Engineering, Vol. 8 (2005): 79-82(In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] C. Z. Wu, X. Sun.Science and Technology Innovation HeraldHH, Vol. 27 (2009), p.5(In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] D. M. Wu, Y. N. Rui. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 4 (2012), pp.17-20(In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] J. H. Friedman, J. W. Tukey. IEEE Trans On Computer, 1974, 23(9): 881-889.

Google Scholar

[5] S. J. Wang, C. J. Ni. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, Vol. 41(2009): 178-180. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Y. P. Du, Y. Z. Liang. Computational Biology and Chemistry, Vol. 27(2003): 339-353.

Google Scholar

[7] J. X. Pan, W. K. Fung, K. T. Fang. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 83 (2000): 153-167.

Google Scholar

[8] D. D. Li, Thanasis Stengos. Economics Letters, Vol. 75(2002), pp.11-16.

Google Scholar

[9] H. X. Liu, X. J. Yao ,M.C. Liu. J. Talanta, Vol. 71(2007), pp.258-263.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Zhang, S. H. Dong. Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 21(1) (2009), p. S154-S157.

Google Scholar