Reduction of Rejection Rate for High Gloss Plastics Product Using Six Sigma Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

High gloss plastics part in injection molding industries were widely used in Malaysia. However the high rejection rate in this industries were major problem affecting the economic aspects. Therefore this paper presents an approach of implementing six sigma method to reduce the rejection rate in a plastic injection molding process for high gloss plastics part. Define, Measure, Analyze Improve and Control (DMAIC) methodology was applied as basis of the study. By using current process, the average of rejection is 40.6% and the aim of this study is to reduce the rejection rate to less than 10 % . All potential factors were taken into account to identify the significant factors. The improvement process was made base on the analysis output. This study was successful with increment in sigma level from 1.74 σ to 3.00 σ. .

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

141-145

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.C. Montgomery., Introduction to Statistical Quality Control., 5th Edition.,  John Wiley & Sons, Inc, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] B. Ozcelik, E. Kuram, M. M Topal, Investigation the effects of obstacle geometries and injection molding parameters on weld line strength using experimental andfinite element methods in plastic injection molding, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 39 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.11.012

Google Scholar

[3] Xuan-Phuong Dang, General frameworks for optimization of plastic injection molding process parameters, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 41 (2014) 15–27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2013.11.003

Google Scholar

[4] W. C. Lo, K. M. Tsai , C. Y. Hsieh, Six Sigma approach to improve surface precision of optical lenses in the injection-molding process, Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2009) 41: 885–896.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1543-0

Google Scholar

[5] Chao-Ton Su, Chia-Jen Chou , A systematic methodology for the creation of Six Sigma projects: A case study of semiconductor foundry Expert Systems with Applications 34 (2008) 2693–2703.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.014

Google Scholar

[6] A.K. Sahooa, M.K. Tiwarib, A.R. Mileham, Six Sigma based approach to optimize radial forging operation variables, journal of materials processing technology 2 0 2 (2008)125–136.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.085

Google Scholar

[7] T. Pyzdek, P. Keller , The Six Sigma Handbook, Third Edition, McGraw Hill Professional, Sep 21, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] D. Valles, J. Sanchez , S. Noriega , B.G. Nuñez, Implementation of Six Sigma in a Manufacturing Process: A Case Study, Implementation of Six Sigma in a Manufacturing Process: A Case Study , International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(3), 171-181, (2009).

DOI: 10.1504/ijssca.2021.10040699

Google Scholar

[9] Subramanian, M. Natamai,    Basics of Troubleshooting in Plastics Processing : An Introductory Practical Guide   John Wiley & Sons, Inc, (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] D.M. Levine, Statistics for six sigma green belts with minitab & JMP, Pearson (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] Jeroen de Mast, J. Lokkerbol An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving Int. J. Production Economics 139 (2012) 604–614.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.035

Google Scholar

[12] V. Arumuga, J. Antony, M. Kumar , Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation Int. J. Production Economics 141 (2013) 388–402.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.003

Google Scholar