Optimal Algorithmic Trading Strategy with the Price Appreciation Cost

Article Preview

Abstract:

Financial markets has witnessed an explosion of algorithmic trading strategy which can help traders especially involved in high-frequency trading efficiently reduce invisible transaction cost. The VWAP strategy usually used by traders can only decrease the cost of price impact by breaking block order into small pieces. However, the behavior of such order splitting may result in inevitable opportunity cost as well as price appreciation. This paper establishes a new algorithmic trading strategy to minimize total transaction costs including price impact, opportunity cost and price appreciation. The results show that the total transaction cost of this optimal trading strategy is lower than VWAP strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

62-65

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Hendershott, C. M. Jones, A. J. Menkveld, Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? The Journal of Finance, 66(2011) 1-33.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01624.x

Google Scholar

[2] D. Leinweber, Algo vs. algo, Institutional Investor Alpha Magazine, 2(2007) 44-51.

Google Scholar

[3] W. H. Wagner, M. Edwards, Best execution, Financial Analysts Journal, 49(1993) 65-71.

DOI: 10.2469/faj.v49.n1.65

Google Scholar

[4] R. Kissell, M. Glantz, Optimal trading strategies: quantitative approaches for managing price impact and trading risk, New York, Amacom, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] R. Z. Yan, P. Li, Y. Zeng, Algorithmic trading strategy based on price impact and opportunity cost, Chinese Journal of Management, 9(2012) 952-959.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Bowe, S. Hyde, L. Mcfarlane, Duration, trading volume and the price impact of trades in an emerging futures market, Emerging Markets Review, 17(2013) 89-105.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2013.08.002

Google Scholar

[7] P. Guo, Development of high-frequency trading in foreign markets and the implications to our market, Securities Market Herald, 7(2012) 56-61.

Google Scholar

[8] S. A. Berkowitz, D. E. Logue, Jr. E. A. Noser, The total cost of transactions on the NYSE, Journal of Finance, 43(1988) 97-112.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02591.x

Google Scholar

[9] D. Bertsimas, A. Lo, Optimal control of execution costs, Journal of Financial Markets, (1988) 1-50.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Almgren, N. Chriss, Optimal execution of portfolio transactions, Journal of Risk, 3(2001) 5-40.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Kissell, M. Glantz, R. Malamut, A practical framework for estimating transaction costs and developing optimal trading strategies to achieve best execution, Fnance Research Letters, 1(2004) 35-46.

DOI: 10.1016/s1544-6123(03)00004-7

Google Scholar

[12] R. Kissell, R. Malamut, Algorithmic decision-making framework, The Journal of Trading, 1(2006) 12-21.

Google Scholar

[13] Z. B. Fang, L. Zhen, Research on algorithmic trading of Chinese stock market based on asymmetric ACD model and multi-interval VWAP algorithm, Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 41(2011) 753-759.

Google Scholar

[14] L. M. Zhong, H. L. Liu, C. F. Wu, Institution investor's optimal liquid strategy, Journal of Management Sciences in China, 5(2002) 18-22.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Lin, D. X. Zhang, H. Yang, Y. Ding, Study on liquidity-adjusted optimal trading strategy model, Journal of Management Sciences in China, 14(2011) 65-76.

Google Scholar