Design of Wireless Sensor Networks Border Router Based on IPv6

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper proposed a design scheme of wireless sensor network border router based on IPv6. Project mainly expounds the realization of hardware and software design of boundary router, focuses on wireless sensor network IPv6 protocol stack adaptation layer design based on. Through the data packet fragmentation and reassembly mechanism as well as the header compression scheme, adaptation layer of protocol stack to achieve the transmission of IPv6 data packet in the IEEE in 802.15.4 link. The experimental results show that, this scheme realizes the seamless integration of wireless sensor network and IPv6 network, data transmission is reliable, practical application value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2957-2960

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sohraby, K., Minoli, D., Znati, T. Wireless sensor networks: technology, protocols, and applications, John Wiley and Sons, 2007 ISBN 978-0-471-74300-2, p.203–209.

DOI: 10.1002/047011276x

Google Scholar

[2] T. Narten, Neighbor discovery and stateless autoconfiguration in IPv6, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, p.54–62, Aug. (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/4236.780961

Google Scholar

[3] David Frost (20 April 2011). Ipv6 traffic volumes going backwards,. iTWire. Retrieved 19 February (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] IPv6,. Google Statistics. Google. Retrieved 13 February (2014).

Google Scholar

[5] R. Droms, J. Bound, B. Volz, T. Lemon, C. Perkins, and M. Carney, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6), Internet Request for Comments, vol. RFC 3315(Proposed Standard), Jul. (2003).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc3315

Google Scholar

[6] Dargie, W. and Poellabauer, C., Fundamentals of wireless sensor networks: theory and practice, John Wiley and Sons, 2010, p.168–183, 191–192.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470666388

Google Scholar