A New Trust Model in P2P Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

The existing trust model in P2P network is limited in inhibiting feedback-cheating peers’ behaviors and can not fully resist the collectives’ attack. To solve this problem, we present a new trust model. It take Malicious Percentage (MP) and Feedback Consistency Percentage (FCP) as the new trust evaluation criterion to help filter malicious peers in selection strategy of peers. For feedback-cheating peers, we use global trust value to distinguish between true and false feedback information. Experiments demonstrate that our model is effective in resisting feedback-cheating peers’ behaviors and collectives’ attack.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3024-3027

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Miao Guang-sheng, Feng Deng-guo, Su Pu-rui. Colluding clique detector based on activity similarity in P2P trust model [J]. Journal on Communications, 2009, 30(8): 9-20.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Shao-xian,. The research of trust model in P2P network[D]. Nan Jing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Sepandar D. Kamvar, Mario T. Schlosser, Hector Garcia-Molina. The EigenTrust Algorithm for Reputation Management in P2P Networks. Stanford University (2003).

DOI: 10.1145/775152.775242

Google Scholar

[4] Dou Wen, Wang Huai-Min, Jia Yan, Zou Peng. A Recommendation-Based Peer-to-Peer Trust Model[J]. Journal of Software, 2004, 15(4): 571-583.

Google Scholar

[5] Jiang Ju, Deng Qian-ni. The Non-Uniform Distribution in eMule System [J]. MicroElectronics and Computer, 2007, 4(10): 153-156.

Google Scholar

[6] Xiali Li, Jingjing Xiang, Sujuan Zhang and Xiaohua Yang. An EnhanEigen Algorithm Trust Model in P2P Network[C]. 2013 International Conference on Mechanical Intelligence and Automatic Control, pp.1177-1180.

Google Scholar