Prediction of siRNA Efficacy Using BP Neural Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the last decade, RNA interference (RNAi) by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) has become a hot topic in both molecular biology and bioinformatics. The success of RNAi gene silencing depends on the specificity of siRNAs for particular mRNA sequences. As a targeted gene could have thousands of potential siRNAs, finding the most efficient siRNAs among them constitutes a huge challenge. Previous studies such as rules scoring or machine learning aim to optimize the selection of target siRNAs. However, these methods have low accuracy or poor generalization ability, when they used new datasets to test. In this study, a siRNA efficacy prediction method using BP neural network (BP-GA) was proposed. For more efficient siRNA candidate prediction, twenty rational design rules our defined were used to filter siRNA candidate and they were used in the neural network model as input parameters. Furthermore, the performance optimization of network model has been done by using genetic algorithm and setting optimal training parameters. The BP-GA was trained on 2431 siRNA records and tested using a new public dataset. Compared with existing rules scoring and BP methods, BP-GA has higher prediction accuracy and better generalization ability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

5341-5345

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Fire, S. Xu, M.K. Montgomery, S.A. Kostas, S.E. Driver and C.C. Mello: Nature Vol. 391 (1998), pp.806-811.

Google Scholar

[2] S.M. Hammond, E. Bernstein, D. Beach and G.J. Hannon: Nature Vol. 404 (2000), pp.293-296.

Google Scholar

[3] G.J. Hannon: Nature Vol. 418 (2002), pp.244-251.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Amarzguioui, H. Prydz: Biochem Biophys Res. Commun. Vol. 316 (2004), pp.1050-1058.

Google Scholar

[5] D. Quan, T. Hakan, W. Jue, W. Claes, L. Zicai: Nucleic Acids Res. Vol. 33 (2005), pp.1671-1677.

Google Scholar

[6] O. Matveeva1, Y. Nechipurenko, L. Rossi: Nucleic Acids Res. Vol. 35 (2007), p. e63.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Ren, W. Gong, Q. Xu, X. Zheng, D. Lin, Y. Wang and T. Li: Bioinform. Vol. 22 (2006), pp.1027-1028.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Saetrom: Bioinform. Vol. 20 (2004), pp.3055-3063.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Huesken, J. Lange, C. Mickanin: Nat Biotechnol. Vol. 23 (2005), pp.995-1001.

Google Scholar

[10] SA. Shabalina, AN. Spiridonov, AY. Ogurtsov: BMC Bioinform. Vol. 7 (2006), p.65.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Mysara, M. Elhefnawi, J. M. Garibaldi: J. Biomed Inform. Vol. 45 (2012), pp.528-534.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Ichihara, Y. Murakumo, A. Masuda, T. Matsuura, N. Asai and M. Jijiwa: Nucleic Acids Res. Vol. 35 (2007), p. e123.

DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm699

Google Scholar

[13] J. Moody, in: From Statistics to neural Networks, edited by V. Cherkassky, J.H. Friedman and H. Wechsler, Part II , Springer Publishers(1994).

Google Scholar

[14] D.F. Wang, X. Chen, F. Zhang: International Symposium on Information Science and Engineering (Shanghai, China, December 20-22, 2008). Vol. 2, pp.84-87.

Google Scholar

[15] T. Katoh , T. Suzuki: Nucleic Acids Res. Vol. 35 (2007), p. e27.

Google Scholar