Analysis of Geometry Deviations in Case of Conical Mini-Parts Obtained by Forming Process from Copper-Zinc Alloy (CuZn37) Sheets

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mini forming is an appropriate technology to manufacture small metal parts, as these are required in many industrial products resulting from mini-technology. This paper work want to underline the fact that even in down scale there are problems regarding deviation from the required dimensions. One of the problems is scaling effects, which occur in tribological aspects such as the friction coefficient, which increases with decreasing specimen size. Simulations investigations into mini forming process were carried out and mini conical parts have been obtained with different geometries. . The main objective is to observe and quantify behaviour of the mini parts during forming process and geometry deviations that affect the final product. The material used in this analysis is copper - zinc alloy with anisotropic properties. During forming process of conical mini-parts, the material record important variation along the part length and generate important shape deviation. This phenomenon causes deviations of sidewall angle, superior diameter, inferior diameter, mini part height, and connection radius between the part bottom and sidewall. There are multiple factors that affect the geometry deviations: sidewall angle, friction coefficient, tools gap, punch radius, and punch speed. The Dynaform 5.9.1 software was used to simulate the forming process. The part obtained after each simulation was analyzed and measured to quantify the deviation from the desired geometry on the final conical mini-part. In the final part of this paper some conclusions regarding geometry deviation of conical mini-parts obtained by forming are presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

158-162

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Vollerston, Z. Hu, H. Schulze Niehoff, C. Theiler, State of the art in microforming and investigations into micro-deep drawing, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 151 (2004) 70–79.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.266

Google Scholar

[2] U. Engel, R. Eckstein, Microforming — from basic research to its realisation, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125–126 (2002) 35–44.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, R. Eckstein, N. Tiesler, U. Engel, Microforming, Ann. CIRP 50 (2) (2001) 445–462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62991-6

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Xie, H. Yu, X. Ruan, Development and future of metal microforming technology, China Mech. Eng. 16 (10) (2005) 935–939.

Google Scholar

[5] EU Masmicro Consortium, Project Technical Reports, NMP2-CT-2004-500095, (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] W.R.D. Wilson, X.B. Huang, T.C. Hsu, A realistic friction model for computer simulation of sheet metal forming processes, Trans. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 117 (1995) 202–209.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2803295

Google Scholar

[7] S. Zhang, P.D. Hodgson, M.J. Cardew-Hall, S. Kalyanasundaram, A finite element simulation of micro-mechanical frictional behavior in metal forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 134 (2003) 81–91.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00926-3

Google Scholar

[8] H. Saiki, Y. Marumo, Influence of the roughness geometry of tool surface and the flow stress of coated solid lubricants on tribo-conditions in cold forging, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 140 (2003) 25–29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00697-6

Google Scholar

[9] M. Geiger, F. Vollertsen, R. Kals, Fundamentals on the manufacturing of sheet metal microparts, Ann. CIRP 1 (1996) 277–282.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63063-7

Google Scholar

[10] N. Tiesler, Microforming—size effects in friction and their influence on extrusion processes, Wire 1 (2002) 34–38.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Gillner, D. Hellrung, A. Bayer, F. Schepp, R. Erhardt, Miniaturization of parts and components (in German), Umformtechnisches Kolloquium Darmstadt 7 (2000) 107–116.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, R. Eckstein, N. Tiesler, U. Engel, Microforming, 51st General Assembly of CIRP, Nancy 50 (2) (2001) 445–462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62991-6

Google Scholar

[13] A. Hannewald, Micro-screws from the rotary press, Umformtechnik 2 (2002) 28–29.

Google Scholar