Simulation Analysis of the Effect of Temperature and Exchange Current Density on Power and Hydrogen Production of (PEM) Electrolyzer

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this manuscript is to analyze the effect of temperature and exchange current density on operating cell voltage, resistance and ionic conductivity of the polymer electrolyte. Equations related to mathematical models for PEM Electrolyzer based on a combination of thermodynamics fundamental and electrochemical relations of the well-known Butler-Volmer kinetic have been used to simulate the system. The result of this study shows a significant drop in membrane Ohmic resistance as the temperature decreases. In conclusion the best operation temperature that corresponds to lower voltage (1.82 V) is 80°C. At power density of about 9 W/ cm2, hydrogen flow rate of 3.5ml/min and 3.78 was observed at 40°C and 80°C respectively, this account for only about 7% increase hydrogen flow rate. These model results are found to agree well with previous published work.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

411-415

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Nie, Y. Chen, R. F. Boehm, and S. Katukota, A Photoelectrochemical Model of Proton Exchange Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production, Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 130, pp.042-409, (2008).

DOI: 10.1115/1.2789722

Google Scholar

[2] http: /www. hydrogenassociation. org/general/faqs. asp#howmuchproduced.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Marangio, M. Santarelli, and M. Cali, Theoretical model and experimental analysis of a high pressure PEM water electrolyser for hydrogen production, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, pp.1143-1158, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.083

Google Scholar

[4] M. Shen, N. Bennett, Y. Ding, and K. Scott, A concise model for evaluating water electrolysis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, pp.14335-14341 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.029

Google Scholar

[5] M. Schalenbach, M. Carmo, D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel, and D. Stolten, Pressurized PEM water electrolysis: Efficiency and gas crossover, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, pp.14921-14933, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.013

Google Scholar

[6] I. Dedigama, P. Angeli, K. Ayers, J. B. Robinson, P. R. Shearing, D. Tsaoulidis, and D. J. L. Brett, In situ diagnostic techniques for characterisation of polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysers – Flow visualisation and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, pp.4468-4482, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.026

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang H, Su S, Lin G, Chen J. Efficiency calculation and configuration design of a PEM electrolyzer system for hydrogen production. Int J Electrochem Sci (2012); 7: 4143-57.

Google Scholar

[8] L. valverde, F. Rosa, A. J. del Real, A. Arce, C. Bordons- Modeling, simulation and experimental set- up of a renewable hydrogen- based domestic micro grid. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35, Elsevier ltd (2013) 2619-2629.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.113

Google Scholar

[9] M. Santarelli, P. Medina, M. Cali- Fitting regression model and experimental validation for a high- pressure PEM electrolyzer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34, Elsevier ltd (2009) 2519-2530.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.036

Google Scholar