Underwater Acoustics Evaluation of Glass Fiber – Polyurethane Sandwich Composite

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article presents underwater acoustics evaluation of glass fiber – polyurethane sandwich composite which is useful for ship materials. The composite consists of two main functional laminations namely structural and acoustical lamination. The structural lamination is constructed from polyester and polyethylene fibers while the polyurethane is potential for acoustical lamination. The fabrication involves vacuum bagging and conventional hydraulic methods. The materials will be treated in both with and without immersion in sea water. The immersion process takes time about 72 hours. The properties of acoustics for each materials generally have high insertion loss (maximum found 25 dB), but some of them can reach low insertion loss (below 5 dB). The optimization of combination between structural and acoustic materials is promising to be investigated in near future to achieve the optimum properties of materials in terms of sound transparency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

516-520

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ji-Hye Lee, Byoung-Nam Kim, Ku-Kyun Shin, Suk Wang Yoon. Insertion loss of sound waves through composite acoustic window materials. Current Applied Physics 2010: 10: 138-144.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.05.017

Google Scholar

[2] P.K. Chakravorty, V. Bhujanga Rao. Some Aspect in the Design of Sonar Domes. Def Sci 1982: 32(1)47-54.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Kootsookos, A.P. Mouritz. Seawater durability of glass and carbon-polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology 2004: 64: 1503-1511.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.019

Google Scholar

[4] E.P. Gellert, D.M. Turley. Seawater immersion ageing of glass-fibre reinforced polymer laminates for marine applications. Composites 1999: 30(A)1259-1265.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(99)00037-8

Google Scholar

[5] Ji-Hye Lee, Byoung-Nam Kim, Ku-Kyun Shin, Jae-Jin Jeon, Suk Wang Yoon. A study of acoustic characteristics for sonar dome window materials. Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Korea Conference 2007: 26(2s): 173-174.

Google Scholar

[6] G.R. Barnard, J.L. Bardin, J.W. Whiteley. Acoustic reflection and transmission characteristics for thin plates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1975: 57(3): 577-584.

DOI: 10.1121/1.380486

Google Scholar

[7] V. Bhujanga Rao. Flow-Induced Noise of a Sonar Dome-Part 1. Applied Acoustic 1985: 18: 21-33.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(85)90003-9

Google Scholar

[8] C.M. Roland. Naval Applications of Elastomers.

Google Scholar

[9] Apicella A, Migliaresi C, Nicolais L, Roccotelli S. The water aging of unsaturated polyester-based composites: influence of resin chemical structure. Composites 1983: 14: 387-392.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(83)90160-x

Google Scholar

[10] Y.L. Young. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers. Journal of Fluid and Structures 2008: 24: 799-818.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.12.010

Google Scholar

[11] Karl D'Souza, Subham Sett, Woo-Jin Jung, Ku-Kyun Shin, Young-Hwan Lee. Modeling the Structural and Acoustic Behavior of a Sonar Dome with ABAQUS. ABAQUS User's Conference (2006).

Google Scholar

[12] Anthony A.C. Sonar Dome,. USA. US 7408842 B2, Aug. 5, (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Xiao, Y.P. Zhang, J.H. Gibson, G.G. Xie, H. Chen,. Performance Analysis of ALOHA and p-persistent ALOHA for Multi-hop Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Cluster Computing 2011: 14: 65-80.

DOI: 10.1007/s10586-009-0093-z

Google Scholar