Synthesis and Characterization of Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate Hydrogels for Biomedical Application

Abstract:

Photo-polymerized polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PEGDMA) scaffolds were synthesized using two macromolecular monomers of 750 and 550 number average molecular weight. Variation in chain length of macromolecular monomers visibly influenced viscoelastic properties of the compositions, exhibiting an increase in shear storage and loss modulus in PEGDMA 750 hydrogels. Furthermore, water content in the pre-polymerization mixture was a main factor determining physical appearance of the samples, where increase in water content resulted in polymerization induced phase separation, demonstrated by opaqueness of preparations containing 60 and 75% (w/w) of H₂O. In addition to this, swelling, gel fraction, compression and rheological measurements are found to be influenced by the amount of water incorporated in the hydrogels, resulting in the increased distance between polymer chains within the network. Furthermore this resulted in an apparent decrease in viscoelastic and mechanical properties of compositions, as well as in lowering their crosslinking density and compressive strength. Preliminary cytotoxicity results show no toxicity of the samples with approximately 80% cell viability after 24 h exposure of MC3T3-E1 Subclone 4 cells to the hydrogels, thus indicating that these materials could be potentially applied in the biomedical arena.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 679)
• Pages: 158-170
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.679.158
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Malgorzata Poplawska, Iska Schimpf, Damien Brady, Carmel Kealey, Anne Mulvihill, Clement L. Higginbotham*
• Keywords: Biomedical Materials, Hydrogels, PEGDMA

References

[1] Nasef, M., In Separation and purification, in: Polymer Grafting and Crosslinking edited by A. Bhattacharya, J. W. Rawlins, P. Ray, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2009, pp.233-272.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470414811.ch10

[2] Hennink W., van Nostrum C. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002 Jan; 54(1): 13–36.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00240-x

[3] Park J-B. The use of hydrogels in bone-tissue engineering. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16(1): e115–e118.

DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e115

[4] Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ. Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2008 Jun; 14(2): 149–65.

DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2007.0332

[5] Radin S, Chen T, Ducheyne P. The controlled release of drugs from emulsified, sol gel processed silica microspheres. Biomaterials. Elsevier Ltd; 2009 Feb; 30(5): 850–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.066

[6] Shi X, Wang Y, Ren L, Huang W, Wang DA. A protein/antibiotic releasing poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/lecithin scaffold for bone repair applications. Int J Pharm. 2009 May 21; 373(1-2): 85–92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.02.013

[7] Freiberg S, Zhu XX. Polymer microspheres for controlled drug release. Int J Pharm. 2004 Sep 10; 282(1-2): 1–18.

[8] Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications. J Adv Res. 2013 Jul; http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jare. 2013. 07. 006.

[9] Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Nov; 944: 62–73.

[10] Dobo J. Radiation Crosslinking of PVC with Ethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate. Pure Appl Chem. 1976 Jan 1; 46(1): 1–7.

DOI: 10.1351/pac197646010001

[11] Mohamad Yunos D, Bretcanu O, Boccaccini AR. Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci. 2008 Apr 18; 43(13): 4433–42.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-008-2552-y

[12] Rahaman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, Fu Q, Jung SB, Bonewald LF, et al. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. Acta Materialia Inc.; 2011 Jun; 7(6): 2355–73.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016

[13] Irish Standard I. S. EN ISO 10993-5: 2009 Standards. Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.

DOI: 10.2345/9781570203558.ch1

[14] Irish Standard I. S. EN ISO 10993-12: 2012 Standards. Biological evaluation of medical devices- Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials: 6-7.

DOI: 10.2345/9781570204500.ch1

[15] Wu YH, Park HB, Kai T, Freeman BD, Kalika DS. Water uptake, transport and structure characterization in poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels. J Memb Sci. 2010 Feb 1; 347(1-2): 197–208.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.025

[16] Bäckström S. Tailoring Properties of Biocompatible PEG-DMA Hydrogels with UV Light. Mater Sci Appl. 2012; 03(06): 425–31.

DOI: 10.4236/msa.2012.36060

[17] Killion JA, Geever LM, Devine DM, Kennedy JE, Higginbotham CL. Mechanical properties and thermal behaviour of PEGDMA hydrogels for potential bone regeneration application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Oct; 4(7): 1219–27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.004

[18] Killion JA, Geever LM, Devine DM, Grehan L, Kennedy JE, Higginbotham CL. Modulating the mechanical properties of photopolymerized polyethylene glycol–polypropylene glycol hydrogels for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci. 2012 Jun 12; 47(18): 6577–85.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6588-7

[19] Killion JA, Kehoe S, Geever LM, Devine DM, Sheehan E, Boyd D, Higginbotham CL. Hydrogel/bioactive glass composites for bone regeneration applications: synthesis and characterisation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. Elsevier B.V.; 2013 Oct; 33(7): 4203–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.06.013

[20] Szepesi M., Bako J, Marton S, Borbély J, Hegedus C. Synthesis and compression strength of hydrogels. 2007; 100(1): 27-31.

[21] Kavanagh G. and S. R-M. CHARACTERISATION POLYMER GELS. 1998; 23(97): 533–62.

[22] Gulrez SKH, Al-Assaf S, Phillips GO. Hydrogels : Methods of Preparation , Characterisation and Applications. Prog Mol Environ Bioeng. 2003; 51(2): 117 – 150.

[23] Grillet AM, Wyatt NB, Gloe LM. Polymer Gel Rheology and Adhesion. (2010).

[24] Mourtas S, Haikou M, Theodoropoulou M, Tsakiroglou C, Antimisiaris SG. The effect of added liposomes on the rheological properties of a hydrogel: A systematic study. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008 Jan 15; 317(2): 611–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.070