Risk Assessment Study for a Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading Vessel (FPSO) in Deep Waters

Bruna C. de S. Lima; Lucas G. de Goes; Natália P.M. Silva; Paola C. Almeida; Erick B.F. Galante; Assed Naked Haddad

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.700.495

Paper Titles

Research on Treatment of Leaded Wastewater by Process Combined Fe/C Micro-Electrolysis with Microbial Adsorbent-Flocculant
p.470

Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution for Rosa sterilis and Soil from Planting Bases Located in Karst Areas of Guizhou Province
p.475

Study on Eu Doped ZnO Photocatalytic Degradation of Pharmaceutical Wastewater
p.482

Study on the Incineration Experiment to Dispose Ptreis vittata L.
p.487

Risk Assessment Study for a Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading Vessel (FPSO) in Deep Waters
p.495

Applications of Variable Fuzzy Set Theory and GIS for Water Resources Vulnerability Assessment of Yellow River Delta
p.501

Characteristics Identification of Runoff and Sediment Flux Based on Wavelet Analysis Approach in Lower Yellow River
p.506

Current Status and Development of Chinese Seawater Desalination Technology
p.511

Investigation of Dissolved Organic Matter after Oxidant Flushing of Simulated Raw Water Distribution System
p.515

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 700Risk Assessment Study for a Floating, Production,...

Risk Assessment Study for a Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading Vessel (FPSO) in Deep Waters

Abstract:

This paper presents a quantitative risk assessment study on a Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading Vessel that operate in Brazilian offshore oil and gas production waters. In particular a study of the risks applied to a Storage Unit and Transfer Oil, focusing on the physical, especially in operations involving storage and handling of flammable liquids. The results showed that the unit must take safety measures process, because a failure in the system can affect other units; the level of security for the population of the ship is within the acceptable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Energy Materials and Environment Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 700)

Pages:

495-500

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.700.495

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2014

Authors:

Bruna C. de S. Lima, Lucas G. de Goes, Natália P.M. Silva, Paola C. Almeida, Erick B.F. Galante, Assed Naked Haddad*

Keywords:

Floating, FPSO, Offloading Vessel, Petrol Extraction, Production, Quantitative Risk Assessment, Storage Vessel

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] D. -D. of Defence, MIL STD 882-E - Standard Practice for System Safety, no. February 2000. Washington, USA: USA, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] J. C. H. Schuller, J. L. Brinkman, P. J. Van Gester, and R. W. Van Otterloo, 'Red Book' - CPR 12E - Methods for determiming and processing probabilities, CPR 12 E - Committee for Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands, (1997).

Google Scholar

[3] P. Suresh, A. Babar, and V. Raj, Uncertainty in fault tree analysis: a fuzzy approach, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 83, p.135–141, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00386-x

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Imura, A. Kaji, and T. Maruyama, Fault tree displaying method and process diagnosis support system, US Pat. 5, 369, 756, (1994).

Google Scholar

[5] CCPS, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, CCPS - CEN. New York: CENTER FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SAFETY OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, (1989).

DOI: 10.1002/9780470935385.pubnote

Google Scholar

[6] D. A. Crow and J. F. Louvar, Chemical Process Safety, 2nd editio. New Jersey: prentice Hall PTR, (2001).

Google Scholar

[7] CETESB, P4. 261- MANUAL DE ORIENTAÇÃO PARA A ELABORAÇÃO DE ESTUDOS DE ANÁLISE DE RISCOS. São Paulo, Brazil: CETESB, Brazil, (2001).

DOI: 10.11606/d.6.2005.tde-10012023-191355

Google Scholar

[8] FEPAM, Manual de Análise de Riscos Industriais. RS, Brazil: FEPAM, RS, Brazil, 2001, p. Projeto de manual de Análise – FEPAM N 01/01.

DOI: 10.35819/scientiatec.v3i1.1498

Google Scholar

[9] C. J. H. Van den Bosch, R. A. P. M. Weterings, N. J. Duijm, E. A. Bakkum, W. P. M. Mercx, W. F. J. M. Engelhard, J. C. A. M. Van Doormaal, and R. M. M. V. Wees, Yellow Book, - CPR 14E - Methods for the calculation of Physical Effects, Third. Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] RIVM, Reference Manual Bevi for Risk Assessment, Version 3. 2, (2009).

Google Scholar