Job Seeking in Social Networking Sites: A Model of Job Seekers’ Intention

Article Preview

Abstract:

We propose a model for studying job seekers’ behavioural intentions to use job seeking social networking sites (SNSs) for securing jobs. To test our model, an online survey was conducted and 48 valid questionnaires were collected. Some important findings include: perceived usefulness has a positive influence on users’ use of job seeking SNS and social information capital could positively affect users’ perceived usefulness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1399-1410

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B. (2007) Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1, article 11.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Google Scholar

[2] McCarthy, C. (2008) Twitter Spreads like Wildfire, but MySpace Still on Top, CNet News, http: /news. cnet. com/webware/?keyword=Nielsen+NetRatings. Accessed on: February 28, (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] National Association of Colleges and Employers NACE (2008) Social Networking Sites Gaining Popularity Among Employers Seeking Job Candidates, http: /www. jobweb. com/jobmarketnews. aspx?id=1693, Accessed on: December 05, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Society of Human Resource Management-SHRM, (2007) Advances in E-Recruiting: Leveraging the jobs Domain, SHRM Research Department, Alexandria VA, USA.

Google Scholar

[5] Davis, F. D-341. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterlu(13: 3), 1989, pp.319-341.

DOI: 10.2307/249008

Google Scholar

[6] Venkatesh, V, and, Davis,F. D, A Theroetical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science(46: 2), 2000, pp.186-204.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Google Scholar

[7] Brown, D.G. (1965) The Market for College Teachers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Google Scholar

[8] Joan DiMicco, David R. Millen , Werner Geyer , Casey Dugan, Beth Brownholtz, Michael Muller, Motivations for social networking at work, Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 2008, San Diego, CA, USA.

DOI: 10.1145/1460563.1460674

Google Scholar

[9] John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Theorizing mobility in community networks, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 66 n. 12, , Dec. 2008 , pp.944-962.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.003

Google Scholar

[10] Jenny Preece, Diane Maloney-Krichmar, Focusing on sociability and usability, Online communities: The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] Maria M. Plummer, Starr Roxanne Hiltzy, Recruitment in Social Networking Sites: A Theoretical Model of Jobseekers' Intentions, AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] Fitzgerald, M. (2004) Interenetworking Technology Review, 107, 3, 44-49.

Google Scholar

[13] Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Tractinsky, N. (1999).

Google Scholar

[14] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Towards a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 425-478.

DOI: 10.2307/30036540

Google Scholar

[15] Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1, 51-90.

DOI: 10.2307/30036519

Google Scholar

[16] Dwyer, C. (2008) Appropriation of Privacy Management within Social Networking Sites, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Information Systems, New Jersey Institute of Technology, New Jersey.

Google Scholar

[17] Rosenblum, D. (2007) What Anyone Can Know: The Privacy Risks of Social Networking Sites, IEEE Security and Privacy, 5, 3, 40-49.

DOI: 10.1109/msp.2007.75

Google Scholar

[18] Granovetter, M. (1974) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Google Scholar

[19] Dooley, D. Social Research Methods, PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, (2001).

Google Scholar

[20] Stone, E.F. Research Methods in Organizational Behavior, Goodyear, Santa Monica, CA, (1978).

Google Scholar

[21] Cook, M., and Campbell, D. T. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

Google Scholar

[22] Kankanhalli et al. (2005) Contributing to Electronic Knowledge Repositories, MIS Quarterly, 29, 1, 114-144.

DOI: 10.2307/25148670

Google Scholar

[23] Comrey, A. L. A First Course in Factor Analysis, Academic Press, New York, (1973).

Google Scholar

[24] Psychometrika (16), 1951, 297-334.

Google Scholar

[25] Nunally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1978).

Google Scholar

[26] Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1998). Structure equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Google Scholar

[27] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research.

DOI: 10.2307/3150980

Google Scholar

[28] Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading (4th ed), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar