The Evaluation of COAs Based on Stochastic Interval Weighted Sum Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

An important element of military operations is the evaluation of courses of action (COAs) in order to overcome emergency situations. In this kind of decision-making situation, it is important to consider several criteria to evaluate the various COAs, and to compare and rank the COAs according to their ability to meet the selected criteria. It is often necessary to balance the importance of these criteria accordingly to commander’s viewpoints. A new method has been proposed for evaluating the COAs that is based on the possibility calculus known as stochastic interval weighted average operator. The method first presents the attributes and its weights by stochastic interval numbers, so empirical and statistical information, as well as for opinions and judgments made by commanders and analysts, all can be integrated, second, the random numbers of sums of independent variables can be generated by Monte Carlo method, lastly, the comparing and sorting of COAs are realized by random variable Comparison. An example is given to demonstrate the feasibility and practicability of the proposed method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1108-1115

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] FM 101-5, Army Planning and Orders Production. 20 January (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Xu Zeshui. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 166: 19-30.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006

Google Scholar

[3] Xu Zeshui. S. Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment[J]. Information Science, 2004, 168: 497-499.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2004.02.003

Google Scholar

[4] Xu Zeshui. Uncertain multi-attribute decision making methods and its application[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2004, 106-150.

Google Scholar

[5] Diao Lianwang, Yu Yongsheng. Monte Carlo method for interval multi-attribute decision-making. The 20th Chinese control and decision conference, 2008. 7, YanTai, China.

DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2008.4597363

Google Scholar

[6] M. Belanger, A. Guitouni, C. Hunter. COA advisory system based on the multiple criteria decision analysis, DREV TN 2000-012. January, (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] De Schuymer, H. De Meyer, B. De Baets. Cycle-transitive comparison of independent random variables[J]. 2005, 96: 352-373.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2004.10.011

Google Scholar

[8] Sheldon M. Ross. Simulation[M]. Singapore: Elsevier Pte Ltd. 2007. 41-48.

Google Scholar