Thoughts on Improving Evaluation of Enterprise Employees’ Performances

Article Preview

Abstract:

As an important part of enterprise management, evaluation of employees’ performances is focused by more and more enterprise administrators. This paper briefly analyzes the reasons for failure evaluation of employees’ performances and provides some measures for improvement, including cultivating employees’ consciousness of treating performance evaluation in a correct way, paying attention to rationality of performance evaluation indicators, enhancing communications on performances, selecting performance evaluation subjects in a scientific way, strengthening trainings on performance evaluation for evaluators, comprehensively utilizing results of performance evaluation, doing work analysis well, classifying duties of posts, using proper methods of evaluation, establishing complaint mechanism for the evaluations, etc.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

396-399

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Zhishan. Aspects of Reasons for Failure of Performance Management [J]. RENCAI ZI YUANKAI FA. 2006. 5. 24-25.

Google Scholar

[2] Rao Rong. Communications on Enterprise Performance: Problems, Reasons and Counter-measures [J]. Business China. 2009(12) 229—230.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhou Xuejun. On Reasons and Measures for Failure of Performance Evaluation [J]. Econo-mist. 2004. 10. 143-145.

Google Scholar

[4] Sun Guiquan. Reasons and Countermeasures for Performance Management Validity [J]. Eco-nomic Forum. 2005(6) 71—73.

Google Scholar

[5] Z Xiao Huang. A Design for the Holistic Measurement of Key Performance Indicators for State-owned Construction Enterprises [N]. Bachelor's Thesis at Southwestern Jiaotong Uni-versity. 2004. 5.

Google Scholar

[6] Longbo Liang. Who's Evaluating You in a Performance Review?, [J]. Construction Enter-prise Management. 2007. 8 34-35.

Google Scholar