Comparison of the Capacity of Chitosan and Iron Hydroxide Flocs for Phosphate Adsorption in Seawater

Kai Li Chen; Wei Jin; Xin He

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.727-728.163

Paper Titles

A Monte Carlo Method for Simulating Drying Temperature of the Gas-Sensing Material Based on Polyacrylonitrile
p.145

Paper: An Emerging Green Furniture Material
p.150

Application of Modified Nano TiO₂ in the Binder of Artificial Marble
p.154

Combined Strengthening-Toughening Technology of High Property Titanium Alloys for Aviation Uses in China
p.158

Comparison of the Capacity of Chitosan and Iron Hydroxide Flocs for Phosphate Adsorption in Seawater
p.163

Compressive Strength of Ground Waste Seashells in Cement Mortars for Masonry and Plastering
p.167

Distribution and Optimization of Residual Stress Fields in Titanium Simulated Blade Treated by Laser Shock Peening
p.171

Effect of Static Magnetic Field on the Main Textures Development of Grain-Oriented Silicon Steel in the Primary Recrystallization
p.177

Effects of K Factor on the Length of Aircraft Sheetmetal Material Preparation under Unfolding State
p.181

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 727-728Comparison of the Capacity of Chitosan and Iron...

Comparison of the Capacity of Chitosan and Iron Hydroxide Flocs for Phosphate Adsorption in Seawater

Abstract:

Adsorption is proposed as an effective method for phosphate removal in real seawater with low phosphate concentration. This paper aimed to investigate the capacity of chitosan and iron hydroxide flocs for phosphate adsorption in real seawater, and the results shown iron hydroxide flocs had better performance of phosphate adsorption than chitosan.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Engineering III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 727-728)

Pages:

163-166

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.727-728.163

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2015

Authors:

Kai Li Chen, Wei Jin*, Xin He

Keywords:

Chitosan, Iron Hydroxide Flocs, Phosphate Adsorption

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Tian S, Jiang P, Ning P, Su Y (2009) Enhanced adsorption removal of phosphate from water by mixed lanthanum/aluminum pillared montmorillonite. Chemical Engineering Journal 151: 141-148.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.006

Google Scholar

[2] Bastin O, Janssens F, Dufey J, Peeters A (1999) Phosphorus removal by a synthetic iron oxidegypsum compound. Ecological Engineering 12: 339-351.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(98)00077-9

Google Scholar

[3] Tanada S, Kabayama M, Kawasaki N, Sakiyama T, Nakamura T, Araki M, Tamura T (2003)Removal of phosphate by aluminum oxide hydroxide. Journal of colloid and interface science 257: 135-140.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00008-5

Google Scholar

[4] Zeng L, Li X, Liu J (2004) Adsorptive removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using iron oxide tailings. Water Research 38: 1318-1326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.009

Google Scholar

[5] Liu H, Sun X, Yin C, Hu C (2008) Removal of phosphate by mesoporous ZrO2. Journal of hazardous materials 151: 616-622.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.033

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang G, Qu J, Liu H, Liu R, Li G (2007) Removal Mechanism of As (III) by a Novel Fe- Mn Binary Oxide Adsorbent: Oxidation and Sorption. Environ Sci Technol 41: 4613-4619.

DOI: 10.1021/es063010u

Google Scholar

[7] JACOBSON J, KENNEDY M, AMY G, SCHIPPERS J (2009) Phosphate limitation in reverse osmosis: An option to control biofouling? Desalination and water treatment 5: 198-206.

DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2009.578

Google Scholar