Detection of the Antibiotic TMP in the Water with HPLC-DAD

Article Preview

Abstract:

Thispaper studies the method of detecting antibiotic trimethoprim (TMP) in theenvironment water, sewage and tap water with high performance liquidchromatography –diode array detector (HPLC-DAD). The chromatographic conditionis confirmed that: the stationary phase is ODS, the mobile phase is acetonitrileand methanoic acid aqueous solution of 0.1%(12:88), the flow rate is 1.5min·L-1; theinjection volume is 5μL,the chromatographic column temperature is 25°C,DAD detection wavelength is 272nm. The experiment result shows that, the linearlydependent coefficient of external standard curve is 0.996, the detection limitis 0.017 mg·L-1, adding standard recovery ranges from 92.6-140.6 %.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

790-793

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ZHANG Bao, LI You-quan, LUO Jian-xun, et al. Progress on Ovine Theileriosis and Genetically Engineered Vaccine in China[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2009, 30(3): 89-94.

Google Scholar

[2] XU Wei-hai, ZHANG Gan, ZOU Shi-chun, et al. OCCURRENCE, Distribution and Fate of Antibiotics in Sewage Treatment Plants[J]. Enironmental Science, 2007, 28(8): 1779-1783.

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG Qin-qin, WANG Kun-ping, YANG Lin, et al. Determination of Macrolide Antibiotic Residues in Water Environment Based on LC[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1787-1796.

Google Scholar

[4] TANG Cai-ming, HUANG Qiu-xin, YU Yi-yi, et al. Simultaneous Determination of Trace Sulfonamides , Macrolides, Trimethoprim and Chloramphenicol in Aquatic Environmnet Using LC-MS[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2009, 28(8): 909-913.

Google Scholar

[5] TAN Jian-hua, TANG Cai-ming, YU Yi-yi, et al. Simultaneous Analysis of Multiple Classes of Antibiotics in Urban River Water by HPLC[J]. Chinese Journal of Chramatography. 2007, 25(4): 546-549.

Google Scholar