A New Parameterization Method for Large-Scale Reservoir History

Article Preview

Abstract:

A novel and simple parameterization method using an ensemble of unconditional model realizations is applied to decrease the dimension of the misfit objective function in large-scale history matching problems. The major advantage of this parameterization method is that the singular value decomposition (SVD) calculation is completely avoided, which saves time and cost for huge matrix decomposition and the eigenvectors computations in parameterization process. After objective function transforms from a higher dimension to a lower dimension by parameterization, a Monte Carlo approach is introduced to evaluate the gradient information in the lower domain. Unlike the adjoint-gradient algorithms, the gradient in our method is estimated by Monte Carlo stochastic method, which can be easily coupled with different numerical simulator and avoid complicated adjoint code. When the estimated gradient information is obtained, any gradient-based algorithm can be implemented for optimizing the objective function. The Monte Carlo algorithm combined with the parameterization method is applied to Brugge reservoir field. The result shows that our present method gives a good estimation of reservoir properties and decreases the geological uncertainty without SVD but with a lower final objective function value, which provides a more efficient and useful way for history matching in large scale field.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

156-160

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hajizadeh Y., Christie M., Demyanov V. Comparative Study of Novel Population-Based Optimization Algorithms for History Matching and Uncertainty Quantification: PUNQ-S3 Revisited, 2010(SPE 136861).

DOI: 10.2118/136861-ms

Google Scholar

[2] Spall J.C. Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation., IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1992, 37(3): 332-341.

DOI: 10.1109/9.119632

Google Scholar

[3] Gao G., G. Li, and A. C. Reynolds. A stochastic algorithm for automatic history matching,. SPE Journal, 2007, 12(2): 196-208.

DOI: 10.2118/90065-pa

Google Scholar

[4] Gao G., M. Zafari, and A. C. Reynolds. Quantifying uncertainty for the PUNQ-S3 problem in a Bayesian setting with RML and EnKF,. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2005 (SPE 93324).

DOI: 10.2118/93324-ms

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang, F. and A. C. Reynolds, Optimization algorithms for automatic history matching of production data, Proceedings of 8th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, (2002).

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201405958

Google Scholar

[6] Gao G. and A. C. Reynolds. An improved implementation of the LBFGS algorithm for automatic history matching,. SPE Journal, 2006, 11(1): 5-17.

DOI: 10.2118/90058-pa

Google Scholar

[7] Sarma, P, L. Durlofsky, and K. Aziz. Implementation of adjoint solution for optimal control of smart wells, , 2005(SPE 92864).

DOI: 10.2118/92864-ms

Google Scholar

[8] Zhao Hui, Li Y., Yao J. Zhang K., et al, Theoretical research on Reservoir Closed-loop Production Management, Science China (Technological Sciences), 2011, 54(10): 2815-2824.

DOI: 10.1007/s11431-011-4465-2

Google Scholar

[9] E. Patelli and H.J. Pradlwarter. Monte Carlo gradient estimation in high dimensions,. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 81(2), 172–188.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.2687

Google Scholar

[10] H.J. Pradlwarter. Relative importance of uncertain structural parameters. Part I: algorithm,. Computational Mechanics, 2006, 40(4), 627-635.

DOI: 10.1007/s00466-006-0127-9

Google Scholar

[11] Xia Yan, A. C Reynolds. An Optimization Algorithm Based on Combining Finite-Difference Approximations and Stochastic Gradient, SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 18-20 February 2013, the Woodlands, Texas, (SPE 163613).

Google Scholar

[12] Peters, L. Arts, R.J., Brouwer, G.K., Geel, et al, Results of the Brugge Benchmark Study for Flooding Optimization and History Matching, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2010, 13(3), 391-405.

DOI: 10.2118/119094-pa

Google Scholar

[13] Chen C., Li G., Reynolds A.C., Closed-loop reservoir management on the Brugge test case, Computational Geosciences, 2010, 49(4), 327-335.

DOI: 10.1007/s10596-010-9181-7

Google Scholar

[14] Chen Y., Oliver D.S., Zhang D. Efficient ensemble-based closed-loop production optimization,. SPE Journal, 2009, 14(4), 634-645.

DOI: 10.2118/112873-pa

Google Scholar