Performance Analysis of Microbial Fuel Cells with Different Exoelectrogens at Low Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of the study is to compare different kinds of microbial species for electricity production in the microbial fuel cells (MFCs) at low temperature. Experiments were conducted with single-chambered MFCs and medium anode inoculated with pure culture from activated sludge. Three kinds of exoelectrogens including Klebsiella sp. ALL-1, Shewanella sp. ALL-2 and Enterobacter sp. ALL-3 were used for evaluating their electricity activity. After adding solution into MFCs, the power of density grew from 50 mV to over 530 mV, and finally maintained at about 520+10 mV during the complete cycles. The results showed that MFCs with Enterobacter sp. ALL-3 had higher power and current density, shorter and more stable working circle at same level of voltage producing than other kinds of exoelectrogens. These characteristics made Enterobacter sp. ALL-3 as optimum exoelectrogen for electricity production at low temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

189-194

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Goldemberg J. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 2007; 315: 808-810.

Google Scholar

[2] Saratale G, Oh S. Biodegradation 2011; 22: 905–919.

Google Scholar

[3] Levin DB, Islam R, Cicek N, Sparling R. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2006; 31: 1496–1503.

Google Scholar

[4] Bennetto H. P., J. Box, G. M. Delaney, et al. Redox-Mediated Electrochemistry of Whole Microorganisms: From Fuel Cell to Biosensors, p.291.

Google Scholar

[5] ChengS., LiuH., LoganB.E. Electrochemistry Communications 8 (2006) 489.

Google Scholar

[6] Logan B., Cheng S., WatsonV., Estadt G., Environmental Science & Technology 41 (2007) 3341.

Google Scholar

[7] Liu LH, Lee CY, Ho KC, et al. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011; 36(21): 13896-13899.

Google Scholar

[8] Nien PC, Lee CY, Ho KC, et al. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102: 4742-4746.

Google Scholar

[9] KorneelRabaey, LargusAngenent, Uwe Schroder and Jurg Keller Bioelectrochemical Systems: From Extracellular Electron Transfer to Biotechnological Application 2010 p.175.

Google Scholar

[10] Biffinger J.C., Pietron J, Ray R, Little B, Ringeisen BR. Biosens Bioelectron 22(8): 1672–1679.

Google Scholar

[11] Bretschger O, Obraztsova A, Sturm CA, et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73(21): 7003–7012.

Google Scholar

[12] Gorby YA, Yanina S, McLean JS, et al. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 103(30): 11358–11363.

Google Scholar

[13] Lanthier M, Gregory KB, Lovley DR. FEMS MicrobiolLett 278(1): 29–35.

Google Scholar

[14] Marsili E, Baron DB, Shikhare ID, et al. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 105(10): 3968–3973.

Google Scholar

[15] Von Canstein H, Ogawa J, Shimizu S, Lloyd JR. ApplEnvironMicrobiol 74(3): 615–623.

Google Scholar