Traditional vs Technological Based Surveillance on Construction Site: A Review

Article Preview

Abstract:

The negative impacts of construction activities can be controlled and reduced through identification of environmental aspects and impacts of construction activities, implementation of the mitigation measures and site monitoring on a regular basis e.g through surveillance in the framework of the Environmental Management System (EMS). Continuous improvement efforts towards traditional methods and increased needs for factual information and productivity in the environmental monitoring field have been met with latest innovations in mobile information and sensory technology options. This paper through literature aims to review the characteristic of both traditional and technology based surveillance while highlighting the on how those methods complement each other.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

247-252

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jenness, V., D.A. Smith, and J. Stepan-Norris, Editors' Note: Taking a Look at Surveillance Studies. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 2007. 36(2): p. vii-viii.

DOI: 10.1177/009430610603600201

Google Scholar

[2] Chen, W.T., et al. Design and implementation of a real time video surveillance system with wireless sensor networks. 2008: IEEE.

Google Scholar

[3] Tasaki, T., et al., A GIS-based zoning of illegal dumping potential for efficient surveillance. Waste Management, 2007. 27(2): pp.256-267.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.018

Google Scholar

[4] Kirchner, R., Surveillance and Threat Detection: Prevention versus Mitigation. 2013: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Google Scholar

[5] Farmer, A., Handbook of environmental protection and enforcement: Principles and practice. 2007: Earthscan.

Google Scholar

[6] International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE), Principles of Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Handbook. 2009, Washington: INECE.

Google Scholar

[7] Yu, C.Y., Environmental Monitoring and Audit in Putrajaya Development, in Environmental Management in Construction - Putrajaya's Experience. 2000: Bangi, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[8] May, P. and S. Winter, Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro‐environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1999. 18(4): pp.625-651.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6688(199923)18:4<625::aid-pam5>3.0.co;2-u

Google Scholar

[9] Alsharif, K., Construction and stormwater pollution: Policy, violations, and penalties. Land Use Policy, 2010. 27(2): pp.612-616.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.002

Google Scholar

[10] European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law (IMPEL), IMPEL Reference Book for Environmental Inspection. 1999, Netherlands.

DOI: 10.46850/elni.2005.008

Google Scholar

[11] Chen, Y. and J.M. Kamara, A framework for using mobile computing for information management on construction sites. Automation in Construction, 2011. 20(7): pp.776-788.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.01.002

Google Scholar

[12] Damian, C., C. Fosalau, and C. Zet. Wireless Communication System for Environmental Monitoring. (2007).

Google Scholar

[13] Mohamad, R.H. and A. Aripin. Issues and Challenges in Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement in Sabah. in Fourth Sabah-Sarawak Environmental Convention 2006. 2006. Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia: Chief Minister's Department, Sabah and Environment Protection Department, Sabah.

DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i13/112975

Google Scholar

[14] Vivoni, E.R. and R. Camilli, Real-time streaming of environmental field data. Computers & Geosciences 2003. 29 (2003) p.457–468.

DOI: 10.1016/s0098-3004(03)00022-0

Google Scholar

[15] Kim, Y.S., et al., A PDA and wireless web-integrated system for quality inspection and defect management of apartment housing projects. Automation in Construction, 2008. 17 (2008): pp.163-179.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.006

Google Scholar

[16] Cheung, S.O., K.K.W. Cheung, and H.C.H. Suen, CSHM: Web-based safety and health monitoring system for construction management. Journal of Safety Research, 2004. 35(2): pp.159-170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.11.006

Google Scholar

[17] Martinez, K., J.K. Hart, and R. Ong, Environmental sensor networks. Computer, 2004. 37(8): pp.50-56.

Google Scholar

[18] Xiang-zheng, D., et al., Internet based environmental monitoring information system and its application in Yili Prefecture. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2002. 12(2): pp.163-170.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02837470

Google Scholar

[19] Bowden, S., et al., Mobile ICT support for construction process improvement. Automation in Construction, 2006. 15(5): pp.664-676.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.08.004

Google Scholar

[20] Bowden, S.L., Application of mobile IT in construction. 2005, © Sarah Louise Bowden.

Google Scholar

[21] Chen, Y. and J.M. Kamara. The use of mobile computing in construction information management. in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) SOAS, London. (2005).

Google Scholar

[22] Chen, Y. and J.M. Kamara, Using mobile computing for construction site information management. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 2008. 15(1): pp.7-20.

DOI: 10.1108/09699980810842034

Google Scholar

[23] Irizarry, J. and T. Gill. Mobile applications for information access on construction jobsites. in International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering. 2009: ASCE.

DOI: 10.1061/41052(346)18

Google Scholar

[24] Cox, S., J. Perdomo, and W. Thabet. Construction field data inspection using pocket PC technology. in International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, CIB w78 conference. (2002).

Google Scholar

[25] Barrenetxea, G., et al. Wireless sensor networks for environmental monitoring: The sensorscope experience. 2008: IEEE.

Google Scholar

[26] Akyildiz, I.F., et al., Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 2002. 38(4): pp.393-422.

DOI: 10.1016/s1389-1286(01)00302-4

Google Scholar

[27] Kazem Sohraby, Daniel Minoli, and Taieb Znati, Wireless Sensor Networks: Technology, Protocols, and Applications. 2007, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

DOI: 10.1002/047011276x

Google Scholar

[28] Zúniga, M. and B. Krishnamachari, Integrating future large-scale wireless sensor networks with the internet. USC Computer Science, Tech. Rep, (2003).

Google Scholar

[29] Ghobakhlou, A., S. Zandi, and P. Sallis, Development of environmental monitoring system with wireless sensor networks. (2011).

Google Scholar

[30] Santini, S., B. Ostermaier, and A. Vitaletti. First experiences using wireless sensor networks for noise pollution monitoring. in Proceedings of the workshop on Real-world wireless sensor networks. 2008: ACM.

DOI: 10.1145/1435473.1435490

Google Scholar

[31] Brüel & Kjær UK Ltd. Carry Online With Interactive Sound Level Meters. 2014 12th March 2014]; Available from: http: /www. bksv. co. uk/newsevents/news/unitedkingdom/2250%20online.

Google Scholar

[32] Telefónica I+D. Smart Santander Project. 2014 14th March 2014]; Available from: http: /www. smartsantander. eu.

Google Scholar

[33] M4D Impact. The EkoBus Project. 2014 14th March 2014]; Available from: https: /mobiledevelopmentintelligence. com/products/3138-ekobus-project.

Google Scholar

[34] Bergdahl, I., et al., Increased mortality in COPD among construction workers exposed to inorganic dust. European Respiratory Journal, 2004. 23(3): pp.402-406.

DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00034304

Google Scholar

[35] Dement, J.M., et al., Airways obstruction among older construction and trade workers at Department of Energy nuclear sites. American journal of industrial medicine, 2010. 53(3): pp.224-240.

DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20792

Google Scholar

[36] Lee, C. -Y., et al., An efficient continuous tracking system in real-time surveillance application. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2011(0).

Google Scholar