A Comparative Study on Magnetic Susceptibility of Cinnamon Soil and Brown Soil in Pingyi County, Shandong Province, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Magnetic susceptibility is the most commonly used soil magnetic parameters, reflecting the degree of magnetization substance. The investigation of two typical soil sections in Pingyi County, Shandong Province shows that there are some differences on magnetic susceptibility between the cinnamon soil profile and the brown soil profile. The results indicate that: (1) Significant difference of magnetic properties is existed among the cinnamon soil profile and the brown soil profile. The mean χlf value of the samples from the cinnamon soil profile is 82.80×10-8m3/kg, distinctly lower than those from the brown soil profile, which have a mean value of 616.72×10-8 m3/kg; (2) This indicates a low proportion of SP in samples from the brown soil profile and a high proportion of SP in samples from the cinnamon soil profile; (3) Magnetic susceptibility features is a new method which can be used for soil preliminary classification.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

743-748

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Thompson and F. Oldfield: Environmental magnetism(Geological Publishing House, Beijing 1995).

Google Scholar

[2] Q.S. Liu and C.L. Deng: Chinese Journal of Geophysics Vol. 52 (2009), p.1041, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Wang, D.S. Xia, Y. Yu, J. Jia, S.L. Tian and X.B. Liu: Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae Vol. 31 (2011), p.1979, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Dong, W.G. Zhang, P. Qian, Q.F. Jiang, Y. Liu and C.Y. Dong: Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae Vol. 32 (2012), p.696, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] X.M. Duan, S.Y. Hu, H.T. Yan, U. Blaha, W. Rosler and E. Appel: Science in China(Series D: Earth Sciences) Vol. 39 (2009), p.1304, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Magiera, J. Michal, S. Marcin and R. Marzena: Geoderma Vol. 160 (2011), p.559.

Google Scholar

[7] P.G. Yang, R.Z. Mao and Z.L. Zhai: Soils Vol. 40 (2008), p.152, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Z.F. Liu, T. Yang, S. Han, Q.L. Zeng, Q.S. Liu: Geological Science and Technology Information Vol. 28 (2009), p.137, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Fu, Y.H. Li, H. Zhang and J.G. Liu: Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment Vol. 28 (2014), p.135.

Google Scholar

[10] E. Moreno, S. Leonardo, D.T. Jaume, A. Winkler and C. Antonio: Atmospheric Environment Vol. 37 (2003), p.2967.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Canbay, A. Aydin and C. Kurtutus: Journal of Applied Geophysics Vol. 70 (2010), p.46.

Google Scholar

[12] B.A. Maher: Aeolian Research Vol. 3 (2011), p.87.

Google Scholar

[13] W.G. Zhang, C.Y. Dong, L.P. Ye, H.L. Ma and L.Z. Yu: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology Vol. 333-334 (2012), p.160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.03.026

Google Scholar

[14] J. L Guo, C.M. Zhang and S.G. Lu: Chinese Journal of Soil Science Vol. 40 (2009), p.1421, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] S.J. Xu, Y. Zhang, Y. Yu, B. Wang and D.S. Xia: Environmental Science Vol. 34 (2013), p.3579, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] Y.X. Shi: Journal of Shandong Agricultural University Vol. 23 (1992), p.387, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[17] X.M. Liu, Z. Liu, B. Lü, S.B. Markovic, J.S. Chen, H. Guo, M.M. Ma, G.Y. Zhao and H. Feng: Chin Sci Bull Vol. 57 (2012), p.3173, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[18] S.F. Qiu, T.P. Ouyang, Z.Y. Zhu, N.S. Huang, M.K. Li, C.J. Tian and Y. Bian: Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences Vol. 39 (2014), p.1454, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[19] Y.J. Dong, Y.Z. Ma, W.F. Chen and Y.X. Shi: Chinese Journal of Soil Science Vol. 39 (2008), p.1400, In Chinese.

Google Scholar