A Case Study on Mode I Fracture Modeling of Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper concerns the simulation of Mode I fracture with a local concrete damage model in explicit finite element code LSDYNA. A reliable modeling of fracture is essential in the analysis of tension-dominated problems, as well as the prediction of concrete damage due to cracking. A special focus of this paper is placed on an effective representation of the tensile localization in finite element modeling while generalized macro material properties are employed to modeling meso-scale problems. An investigation into the use of a typical damage plasticity concrete model within LSDYNA Explicit, based on the crack band theory, is described in detail. The main focus of the current paper is on the tensile softening branch.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1351-1356

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bazant, Z.P. and Oh, B.H. (1983). Crack band theory for fracture of concrete, Materials and Structures, Vol. 16, No. 3, p.155–177.

Google Scholar

[2] CEB-FIP (1993). Model Code 1990 for Concrete Structures. Comitéeuro-international du Béton(CEB), Laussane, Switzerland.

DOI: 10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430.0014

Google Scholar

[3] Kwak, H.G., Filippou, F.C. (1990), Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures under monotonic load,. Research report of Department of Civil Engineering, U.C. Berkeley, No. UCB/SEMM-90/14.

Google Scholar

[4] Li, X.Q., Chen, J.F., Lu, Y. and Y, Z.J. (2015), Modelling Static and Dynamic FRP-Concrete Bond Behaviour, Advances in Structural Engineering, vol. 18 No. 1, pp.45-58.

DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.18.1.45

Google Scholar

[5] LSTC (2007). Theory Manual Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), Livermore, CA, USA.

Google Scholar

[6] LSTC (1998). Keywords User's Manual Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), Livermore, CA, USA.

Google Scholar

[7] Malvar, L. J., Crawford, J. E.,  Wesevich, J. W. , Simons, D. (1997), A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D, International Journal of Impact Engineering Vol. 19, No. 9-10, pp.847-873.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00023-7

Google Scholar

[8] Malvar, L. J, Crawford, J.E., Morrill, K.B. (2000), K&C Concrete material model release3—automated generation of material model input, K&C documents, August.

Google Scholar

[9] Petersson, P.E. (1981), Crack growth and development of fracture zone in plain concrete and similar materials, Report TVBM-1006, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.

Google Scholar

[10] Saleh, A.L. Aliabadi, M.H. (1995), Crack growth analysis concrete using boundary element method, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 51, p.533–545.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(94)00301-w

Google Scholar

[11] Tu, Z.G., Lu, Y. (2009), Evaluation of typical concrete material models used in hydrocodes for high dynamic response simulations, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.132-146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.010

Google Scholar

[12] Van Mier, J. G. M. (1997), Fracture processes of concrete: Assessment of Material Parameters for fracture Models, CRC Press, Inc.

Google Scholar