Slurry Improvement by Direct Drainage Vacuum Preloading Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Traditional vacuum preloading method has two drainage parts: 1) horizontal drainage part-sand cushion; 2) vertical drainage part-(Prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) and so on). During vacuum preloading process, the drainage effect of horizontal sand cushion is strong near stabilized soil surface and decreases rapidly at deeper position, while drainage range of vertical drain includes whole stabilized soil depth and its drainage ability is higher. So, it is important to improve the drainage design of vacuum preloading system to transmit vacuum head to vertical drain more efficiently. This paper presents a new vacuum preloading method-direct drainage vacuum preloading method (DDVP method). Compared with traditional vacuum preloading method, this system cancels horizontal drainage part-sand cushion and uses sealed pipe to directly connect with PVDs. Vacuum head can be transmitted into PVD without attenuation. Field test is applied to study the effect of slurry improvement of this method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

589-592

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Arulrajah A and Bo MW (2008) Factors Affecting Consolidation Related Prediction of Singapore Marine Clay by Observational Methods. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering: an international journal, Springer 26(4): 417-430.

DOI: 10.1007/s10706-008-9178-3

Google Scholar

[2] Chu J, Yan SW, and Yang H (2000) Soil improvement by the vacuum preloading method for an oil storage station. Géotechnique 50(6): 625–632.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.2000.50.6.625

Google Scholar

[3] Chu J, Bo MW and Arulrajah A (2009) Reclamation of a Slurry Pond in Singapore. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering 62(1): 13-20.

DOI: 10.1680/geng.2009.162.1.13

Google Scholar

[4] Indraratna B, Bamunawita C and Khabbaz H (2004) Numerical modeling of vacuum preloading and field applications. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 41(6): 1098–1110.

DOI: 10.1139/t04-054

Google Scholar

[5] Saowapakpiboon J, Bergado DT, Voottipruex P, Lam LG and Nakakuma K (2011) PVD improvement combined with surcharge and vacuum preloading including simulations. Geotexiles and Geomambrances 29 (1): 74–82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.008

Google Scholar